An initiative to refer the controversial Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) to a plebiscite has received enough signatures for submission to the Referendum Review Committee once again, organizers said.
Following two failed attempts earlier this year, the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) announced yesterday it had gathered another 100,000 petition signatures, more than the number needed to be considered for placement on a future ballot.
“This initiative is reflective of the level of determination Taiwanese have to repeal the ECFA,” TSU Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) said, leading party members in submitting the boxes of signatures to the Central Election Commission.
PHOTO: GEORGE TSORNG, TAIPEI TIMES
“Although the ECFA has already come into force, we still want to remind the public that the agreement’s negative effects will soon become increasingly apparent,” he said. “Very soon, everybody will be feeling the impact.”
The measure, which must be approved by the Central Election Commission and the referendum committee before it can proceed to the second stage of the referendum process, will put the entire agreement to a legally binding public vote.
The committee, which is responsible for screening referendum measures, earlier this year rejected two related proposals that were spearheaded by the TSU, citing a contradiction between the referendum question and content of the proposal. An earlier proposal raised by the DPP was also rejected last year.
The TSU claims that efforts to block the referendums were “unfair and undemocratic,” citing the Referendum Act (公投法), a position the government has dismissed.
Critics have said that the poll is necessary because the ECFA, which reduces cross-strait tariffs for select goods and services, will result in a harmful influx of cheaper Chinese goods. This could depress middle-class salaries and cost jobs, they said, especially among more traditional industries.
In April, a poll by the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) found that 36 percent of Taiwanese surveyed said they opposed the agreement compared with 28 who supported it.
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of
RSS