Impatient with the Council of Indigenous Peoples’ (CIP) response to Pingpu Aborigines’ demand for recognition, activist Lin Sheng-yi (林勝義), a Pingpu from the Ketagalan tribe, yesterday urged the government to create a separate ministry to handle Pingpu affairs.
“I don’t know why is it so hard for the CIP to officially recognize the Pingpu as Aborigines,” Lin told a news conference in Taipei. “The Pingpu have been considered indigenous peoples by the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues since 1994 and we’ve always been active in Aboriginal movements — why is it so hard to recognize us as Aborigines?”
“The council is controlled by Aborigines living in the mountains. We demand that the government create a separate agency for the Pingpu,” he said.
Pingpu (平埔) — or “flat lands” — is a term widely used to describe Aborigines who once inhabited most of lowland areas around the country.
The Ketagalan were the first inhabitants of northern Taiwan, with their historical tribal area stretching from Taoyuan County to the Greater Taipei area and parts of Yilan County.
With the arrival of Han immigrants from China, most of the Pingpu were either driven off their own lands or they gradually assimilated into the immigrant communities.
Like other Aborigines, many Pingpu were officially recognized as Aborigines until the 1950s, but they then lost their status because of a failure to register their ethnic status with the government.
In recent decades, many Pingpu have been active in participating in the Aboriginal rights movement, as well as in the campaign to restore official recognition of their ethnic status.
The council has been reluctant to give an immediate, positive response to the Pingpu campaign. However, earlier this year, Council of Indigenous Peoples Minister Sun Ta-chuan (孫大川) resurrected a Pingpu commission within the council — which was first started by the Democratic Progressive Party, but allowed to expire by former council chief Chang Jen-hsiang (章仁香) — to work on resolving the issue.
Lin is equally unhappy with the Pingpu commission.
“What good could a commission with an annual budget of only NT$1 million[US$31,400] do? What could the 12 Pingpu commission members really do within a council that does not recognize the Pingpu?” Lin asked.
Lin’s call for a separate Pingpu affairs agency did not win support from most other Pingpu activists.
“We’re not happy with the council’s slow responses to our demands, but we’re Aborigines, so of course our business is the council’s business,” Kahavu Cultural Association executive director Aylian Hsiao (蕭愛蓮) told the Taipei Times by telephone. “I would not oppose having a separate agency for Pingpu, but it definitely is not my first choice.”
The Kahavu are a Pingpu Aboriginal tribe living in Nantou County’s Puli Towship (埔里).
Head of Tainan County Alliance of Siraya Communities, Tuan Hung-kun (段洪坤), who is also the deputy convener of the council’s Pingpu commission, said he would never have asked for a separate Pingpu agency.
“The Pingpu are Aborigines, we should always stand with our Aboriginal brothers and sisters,” he said. “We’re fighting for our ethnic identity, not for a cultural identity.”
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods