ECFA: TSU still fighting for vote on ECFA

Thu, Jul 01, 2010 page3

ECFA: TSU still fighting for vote on ECFA

PERSISTING The TSU delivered 105,000 petition forms to the Central Election Commission in its second attempt to call for a referendum on the recently signed cross-strait pact
- By Vincent Y. Chao / STAFF REPORTER
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) is showing no sign of giving up its fight to turn the recently signed cross-strait trade agreement over to a public referendum.
Delivering nearly 100 boxes, each holding more than 1,000 signed petition forms, to the Central Election Commission (CEC) yesterday, TSU officials said the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) could alter the status quo for Taiwan and lock the country into a “one China” framework.
“Everyone can clearly see that this ECFA will change Taiwan’s economic, social and political relationship with China,” TSU Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) said outside the CEC in Taipei. “President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is unilaterally changing the cross-strait situation, and we want to ask him: Doesn’t this require the people’s approval?”

Taiwan Solidarity Union Chairman Huang Kun-huei, second right, and other protesters gather outside the Central Election Commission in Taipei yesterday to present a petition for the holding of a referendum on the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, which was signed on Tuesday.

PHOTO: CNA

This is the second referendum proposal on the controversial agreement raised by the TSU, which wants to ask voters whether they agree with the government’s decision to sign the ECFA with China. The earlier proposal was rejected by the Referendum Review Commission last month after it said the TSU’s referendum question and content contradicted one another.
Flanked by a number of pro-independence organizations, including the Taiwan Association of University Professors and the World United Formosans for Independence, a dozen TSU officials arrived outside the commission, wheeling dozens of brown boxes containing the petition forms.

An apparent misunderstanding initially took place between the TSU officials and police after police officers first closed the outside gates, barring entry to party officials trying to hand their petition forms over to the CEC.
Amid cries from dozens of protesters at the scene, who yelled that a referendum “is a public right,” and “the ECFA needs a referendum,” police opened the outside gate to a small number of TSU officials including Huang, but subsequently tried to close the glass doors to the building.
All of the TSU’s 105,000 petition forms were eventually delivered after CEC officials came out to officially accept the TSU proposal, which prevented tension from boiling over as more than 20 police officers looked on.
Under the Referendum Act (公民投票法), the CEC has 15 days to either accept the proposal and pass it on to the Referendum Review Committee or send it back to the organizers pending corrections of any errors found.
The referendum review committee must then make a decision on whether to give the go-ahead within one month.
If passed, the TSU will have to gather a total of 860,000 petition forms — 5 percent of the voting public in the last presidential election — before the proposal can be put to the ballot box.
Fearing a repeat of last month’s rejection of the more than 110,000 petitions submitted at the time, Huang called on members of the Referendum Review Committee to avoid politicizing the referendum process.
“The committee and the CEC are responsible for aiding the people’s right to a referendum, not blocking it. Committee members should not see the public as the enemy,” Huang said.
Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.
Most Popular