Chinese democracy activist Wang Dan (王丹) stirred debate recently over his suspicions that Chinese students may be “conducting organized activities” on college campuses in Taiwan.
In his latest post on Facebook, Wang said he raised the matter because he wanted to remind Taiwanese that this was now taking place in their country.
Wang, who is a guest lecturer at Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Taiwan History, gave a speech at Providence University in Taichung on Thursday titled “How to See the Real China.” During the two-hour event, a group of Chinese students studying in Taiwan challenged Wang, a student leader during the Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989.
PHOTO: LIU HSIN-DE, TAIPEI TIMES
After the incident, Wang alleged that the students had planned to do this on his Facebook page.
Liao Jui-ming (廖瑞銘), an associate professor at the university’s Department of Taiwanese Literature who attended the event, said that while the students might have been within their rights to challenge Wang, the manner in which they did so highlighted their poor understanding of democracy vis-a-vis their Taiwanese counterparts.
A video of the incident shows some Chinese students repeatedly questioning the content of Wang’s speech, which addressed, among other subjects, dishonesty and cynicism in Chinese society.
They accused him of being unfair to the Chinese people because of his hatred for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
On his Facebook page, Wang said the incident didn’t look like individual behavior.
“Doesn’t the thought of Chinese students engaging in organized activity on Taiwanese campuses give you the chills?” Wang asked.
Wang said he was not making sensational comments to scare the public, adding that student council president at University of Hong Kong, who had previously made comments to the effect that there was no such thing as a Tiananmen Square Massacre on June 4, 1989, was elected following organized voting by Chinese students.
“Taiwanese should take note of these things and not be too naive,” Wang said.
Liao said the 70 students who attended the speech were free to ask questions. However, few Taiwanese students were able to do so, as the Chinese students dominated the session. He said that while Wang might have been slightly intimidated by the scene, the atmosphere actually wasn’t too bad.
Wang said the Taiwanese students were too “mild,” while thanking the Chinese students for the “shock” after his speech.
Some Taiwanese students in the audience said they didn’t think the atmosphere was intense at the time, adding that although the comments made by the Chinese students were sharp, they stemmed from nationalist sentiment and were nothing to worry about.
Replying to a question by a Chinese student, Wang “alerted” Taiwanese students by asking them if they felt that the Chinese students had come “prepared.”
Wen Tsung-han (溫忠翰), a student at the Institute of Taiwan History in charge of receiving Wang at the event on Thursday, said that about 10 Chinese students attended the speech, seven of whom were seated in the front row.
They took notes diligently and adopted a strong tone in their questions. Some remarks were unfriendly, Wen said.
Wen said the possibility of “professional students” never crossed his mind.
Wang said his initial reaction was to assume that the Chinese students had perhaps not heard different views on the massacre, which would explain their strong reaction to his criticism of China. Only afterwards did it dawn on him that something “wasn’t right,” he said.
Liao said Wang’s warning to Taiwanese students was well-intended and added that the Taiwanese in the audience had displayed great respect for differences of opinion during the event.
When a Taiwanese student asked Wang about China’s progress on democracy, Liao said, the student took a moment to send “his regards” to a Chinese student who had spoken before him, saying that “the student from China loves his motherland very much. I also love my motherland very much, but I do not love China.”
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on