President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Tuesday broke his silence on former Toronto-based Government Information Office (GIO) official Kuo Kuan-ying (郭冠英) after 14 days, condemning his online articles smearing Taiwan and Taiwanese.
Ma at the time said he hoped the controversy would end, but analysts who believe the president’s comment was too little, too late said the controversy was unlikely to end anytime soon.
After repeated denials, Kuo last week admitted that he had written the controversial articles under the pen name Fan Lan-chin (范蘭欽). The articles say, among other things, that “[China] should spend many years suppressing [people in Taiwan] instead of granting any political freedom [to them] once it has taken Taiwan by force.”
PHOTO: HUANG CHIH-YUAN, TAIPEI TIMES
Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) said a person whose remarks incited ethnic hatred should be condemned, but emphasized that Kuo’s articles had been published between 2005 and 2007, when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was in power.
He also said that the controversy over Kuo’s remarks was the result of “provocation by some politicians.”
Criticizing Wang as “arrogant,” Hawang Shiow-duan (黃秀端), a political science professor at Soochow University, said Wang was implying the DPP was to blame for the articles.
Hawang said she believed there were more government officials like Kuo who have not “come out of the political closet.”
Hawang said the legislative by-election in Taipei City’s Da-an District had been among the factors contributing to Ma’s decision to come forward.
“Ma might have seen that the matter has gotten out of hand and that it was necessary for him to come out and say something,” Hawang said.
While Ma said he would like to see the controversy end here, Hawang said that whether it would end would hinge on Kuo’s attitude, pointing out that Kuo had continued to make contentious remarks in Toronto, as in an interview with ETTV on Wednesday in which he called himself a “hero.”
Chao Yung-mao (趙永茂), a political science professor at National Taiwan University, agreed that yesterday’s Da-an by-election “more or less” played a role in Ma’s comments.
Following the KMT’s defeat in a legislative by-election in Miaoli, it sought to court centrist voters and KMT sympathizers, Chao said.
The controversy over Kuo’s articles was not over, he said, because the issue would be mentioned repeatedly in elections and the investigation into the matter was not finished.
Career civil servants must remain politically neutral, Chao said, adding that Kuo would have had full freedom of speech had he not been a civil servant.
Joseph Tsai (蔡榮祥), a political science professor at National Chung Cheng University, said Ma’s decision to denounce Kuo had more to do with his own sliding approval rating.
“Most politicians are selfish. They usually do whatever is best for them. His approval rating has dropped to 28 percent, so it would be a good idea for him to do a little bit of damage control here, or he will be held responsible if Kuo continues to stir up controversy,” Tsai said.
Tsai said he believed Kuo was not the only “Fan Lan-chin” in the government.
Although Kuo was free to advocate unification with China, racist remarks could not be tolerated, Tsai said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods