The Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) yesterday came under fire from environmental groups that accused the agency of violating the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (環境影響評估法) in relation to a proposed power plant.
At a meeting yesterday of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) committee tasked with reviewing the plans for the coal-fired Changpin Industrial Park (彰濱工業區) power plant, environmental groups said the project could not be reconsidered as a new proposal because it had already been rejected by another EIA committee.
In response, the committee postponed the evaluation yesterday, saying it would look into the allegations that the review would violate procedure.
PHOTO: CNA
The activists had filed a complaint about the matter with the Control Yuan.
“Last April, the Changpin power plant was found to be ‘unfit for development’ ... However, [Taipower found a loophole in the law] and withdrew the project before the committee could make its recommendation to the EIA panel,” said Taiwan Environmental Protection Union (TEPU) chairwoman Gloria Hsu (徐光蓉), who served as chairwoman on the committee last year.
In the EIA process, a case is usually first reviewed by an EIA committee; once the committee is satisfied that it has received the necessary information to evaluate the project — a process that can take several years — the committee passes on its recommendation of “fit” or “unfit” to an EIA panel.
The panel usually accepts the committee’s conclusion.
“This year, Taipower refiled the power plant proposal as a new case, with few changes to the construction plan, in an attempt to go through the EIA process again as a first-phase project,” Hsu said.
Cases that do not pass the first phase of the EIA process, such as those deemed to have a sizeable environmental impact, are put to a second phase review that is more complex and usually has stricter requirements for the developer.
The EPA’s decision to let Taipower resubmit its proposal as new has set an unwanted precedent, said Thomas Chan (詹順貴), a lawyer who also served on the EIA committee that reviewed the Changpin proposal.
“Hung-du Alishan International Development Corp, the potential developer of a hotel on top of Alishan, which also received a negative recommendation from its EIA committee recently, withdrew its proposal from the EPA yesterday, too,” Chan said.
“This is like a defendant trying his luck with different judges until he gets a favorable verdict ... If the EPA allows this to happen, other developers are bound to follow suit,” he said. “In the meantime, the EPA and state-owned Taipower are wasting taxpayers’ money.”
As the nation already generates enough electricity for domestic usage, the electricity generated by the Changpin power plant would fuel further construction projects, TEPU Changhua district director Tsai Chia-yang (蔡嘉揚) said.
“Building more coal-burning power plants should not be part of Taiwan’s future; the government should practice what it preaches by reducing carbon emissions and electricity consumption,” he said.
An EPA official said, however, that the EPA’s interpretation of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act was within its rights and that Taipower had the right to withdraw its proposal before it reaches the EIA panel. Nevertheless, the EIA committee chair postponed the review until the Control Yuan has ruled on the legality of resubmitting projects.
Taiwan would benefit from more integrated military strategies and deployments if the US and its allies treat the East China Sea, the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea as a “single theater of operations,” a Taiwanese military expert said yesterday. Shen Ming-shih (沈明室), a researcher at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, said he made the assessment after two Japanese military experts warned of emerging threats from China based on a drill conducted this month by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Eastern Theater Command. Japan Institute for National Fundamentals researcher Maki Nakagawa said the drill differed from the
‘WORSE THAN COMMUNISTS’: President William Lai has cracked down on his political enemies and has attempted to exterminate all opposition forces, the chairman said The legislature would motion for a presidential recall after May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said yesterday at a protest themed “against green communists and dictatorship” in Taipei. Taiwan is supposed to be a peaceful homeland where people are united, but President William Lai (賴清德) has been polarizing and tearing apart society since his inauguration, Chu said. Lai must show his commitment to his job, otherwise a referendum could be initiated to recall him, he said. Democracy means the rule of the people, not the rule of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), but Lai has failed to fulfill his
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by
A rally held by opposition parties yesterday demonstrates that Taiwan is a democratic country, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday, adding that if opposition parties really want to fight dictatorship, they should fight it on Tiananmen Square in Beijing. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) held a protest with the theme “against green communists and dictatorship,” and was joined by the Taiwan People’s Party. Lai said the opposition parties are against what they called the “green communists,” but do not fight against the “Chinese communists,” adding that if they really want to fight dictatorship, they should go to the right place and face