The nation is divided over whether Beijing's recent meeting with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) is a gesture of good will, according to a poll released by the independence-leaning Taiwan Thinktank yesterday.
The survey found that while 40.9 percent of respondents felt Beijing's invitation for Lien to visit was an indication of good will, 45.2 percent said that the gesture was aimed at dividing Taiwanese sentiment.
Not surprisingly, opinion on the matter was divided along party lines, with 79.4 percent of survey participants who identified themselves as supporters of the pan-green camp viewing Beijing's invite as a move to polarize the nation. Only 13.2 percent of the pan-green supporters felt Beijing exhibited genuine good will in arranging to meet with opposition party leaders.
The majority of pan-blue supporters, 76.4 percent, was likewise in favor of interpreting Hu's invitation as a sign of good will.
The Taiwan Thinktank commissioned a survey asked about 1,000 respondents for their views on the recent contact between opposition parties and high-level Beijing authorities. Respondents were 20 years old or above and were contacted last Tuesday and Wednesday.
Explaining the poll results yesterday, Taipei Society chairman Hung Yu-hung (洪裕宏) said that Lien had given the impression during his trip to China that notions of sovereignty could be fudged.
Former Mainland Affairs Council vice chairman Chen Ming-tong (陳明通), remarking on the Taiwan Thinktank's poll yesterday, said that the results indicated a poor review of Lien's performance in China.
"Lien should really take a look at these poll results and consider what he did for the country in China," Chen said.
When asked which political leader was best to entrust with cross-strait relations, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) garnered 37.6 percent of the vote and Lien 30.2 percent. People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) came in as the respondent's last pick.
Significantly, however, more respondents felt that Soong could better cooperate with the government. Twenty percent said Lien could work with the governing party on cross-strait policies, but 39.5 percent thought Soong could do the job better.
While the majority of supporters of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said Soong would work better with the government, only 39.3 of KMT respondents thought their own chairman could work with the government; 34.1 percent of KMT participants opted for Soong on the question.
Perhaps more to the point, however, 17.8 percent felt that neither Soong nor Lien could cooperate with government officials. Among DPP participants, 24.4 percent felt neither opposition party candidate was capable of collaborating with the elected government.
Asked whether Lien had effectively defended the nation's sovereignty during his recent trip to Beijing, 28.9 percent responded in the affirmative, while 55.2 percent said he had not.
Similarly, 66 percent of respondents felt Lien had not protested the military threat Beijing posed to Taiwan; 16.2 percent of those polled felt he had.
"Lien focused primarily on economic matters, but a nation has other values. I am worried that this will degrade Taiwan, making it an economic nation only," Hung said, citing the need for cultural depth as well.
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS