The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) yesterday vowed to launch a signature drive tomorrow, urging President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to initiate a defensive referendum to counter China's "anti-secession" law.
"We thought the time was ripe for Chen to mount a defensive referendum, as China's National People's Congress is scheduled to pass the legislation [tomorrow]," said TSU Chairman Shu Chin-chiang (蘇進強).
"However, we recognize the dilemma the president faces as the head of state," he said.
"Therefore, we will launch a signature drive to petition the president to mount a defensive referendum," Shu added.
According to the Referendum Law (公投法), the head of state can initiate a so-called "defensive referendum" once the country faces an external threat to its security and sovereignty through a resolution in the Executive Yuan.
Shu made the remark yesterday morning during a discussion forum held by the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
In addition to urging the president to call for a defensive referendum, Shu called on the pan-blue opposition parties to support the proposed arms procurement plan.
"If the arms budget fails to pass in the legislature, it is bound to lead Beijing to believe that we are a politically divided country, and the US to think that we are reluctant to protect ourselves," Shu said. "If Taiwan is not a united country, I am afraid there won't be any future for us."
Shu also urged the public to understand that Beijing, and not Taiwan, is the troublemaker in the Taiwan Strait.
"While China characterizes Taiwan's national title rectification and constitutional reform plans as means to change the status quo, it is in fact China's military intimidation that threatens the status quo," he said.
If we do as the pan-blue alliance or the US government says to restrain ourselves from provoking China for the sake of cross-strait harmony, it is tantamount to admitting defeat, Shu said.
"I hope the US and Japanese governments adopt more concrete measures, such as imposing sanctions on China in the face of its bullying behavior," Shu said.
Chen Lung-chu (陳隆志), president and CEO of the foundation and an international law professor at the New York Law School, said that China is challenging international laws and UN agreements by enacting the "anti-secession" law.
Since China is a member of the UN, Chen Lung-chu called on Beijing to respect international law and prevent the enactment of the law before it is too late.
"If [Beijing] refuses to do so, it will have to face the consequences of violating international law and tantamount to committing war crimes and sabotaging world peace, just as former German dictator Adolf Hitler did," Chen Lung-chu said.
Chen Lung-chu yesterday also lambasted the government's further opening up cross-strait business ties, including direct charter flight services.
"Since China is our enemy, it is extremely odd to me that Taiwanese businesspeople are oblivious to national security and invest a massive amount of capital in China," he said.
Only when China agrees to adopt peaceful means to solve the cross-strait disputes and treats Taiwan on an equal footing can we expect the establishment of normal interaction between both sides, he added.
Echoing Chen Lung-chu's opinion, Li Ming-juinn (李明峻), a researcher at the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University, said that it is equally important for the government to abolish existing laws advocating unification, in addition to making our voices heard in the international community.
"Geography textbooks cover the 36 provinces of China and the Presidential Office's Web site includes Mongolia in the nation's official map. I am afraid the government doesn't have much ground to criticize China for advocating unification," Li said.
Li was referring to Article 2 of the National Security Law (國家安全法) and Civic Society Law (人民團體法), which stipulate that people gathering or forming associations cannot advocate such ideas as communism or the separation of the nation's territory.
Article 1 of the Statute Governing the Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) also specifies that the legislation is codified to safeguard the security and welfare in the people of Taiwan "before the nation is unified."
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS