The Mainland Affairs Council countered Beijing's criticism of the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) planned protest against China's proposed "anti-secession" law yesterday, saying that China would have to clean up its own mess.
"He who ties the bell on the tiger must also take it off," a council statement read, indicating that, as the troublemaker, China, should put an end to the trouble the bill has created.
"No matter what means China employs to dilute or cover the law, there is no way to mask the law's ridiculous and deceptive nature," the statement read.
Beijing's Taiwan Affairs Office chief Chen Yunlin (
Chen made the remark after the DPP said it expected to attract up to 500,000 people to a rally to protest the law, which would make it illegal -- in Beijing's view -- for Taiwan declare independence from China. The rally is to take place on March 26.
"A few separatists seeking Taiwan independence ... distort the anti-secession law mislead and cheat the majority of their Taiwan compatriots, and stir up feelings against the mainland," the Taiwan Affairs Office official said.
"The DPP even said [they would] take further action to sabotage cross-strait relations," Chen added.
Xinhua quoted Chen as saying that Taiwan "again attempted to push cross-strait relations to a dangerous edge, arousing indignation from Chinese at home and abroad."
The law, almost certain to be passed tomorrow by China's rubber-stamp parliament -- the National People's Congress -- gives the Chinese military the legal basis to attack Taiwan if it formally declares independence. At the same time, Beijing insists that "non-peaceful means" will be used only as a last resort.
Council spokesman Chiu Tai-san (
"China needs to seriously reconsider how the people of Taiwan will react to this law," Chiu said, alluding to the fact that the protest was a result of China's proposed legislation.
"Chen does not take into account the fact that a majority of Taiwanese people are opposed to the law," Chiu said.
"If China chooses to view the Taiwanese people's opposition to violence and love for peace as the destruction of cross-strait ties, China would be making yet another big mistake and would be greatly misjudging the country," the council statement said.
China's first mistake, according to the council, was its "unilateral move to pass the bill."
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS