Yesterday, on Human Rights Day, a group of aged lepers traveled with sticks and wheelchairs from Taiwan's sole public leper hospital "Happy Life Sanitarium" in Hsinchuang, Taipei County, to protest in front of the Executive Yuan. They were calling on the government to preserve the leper colony the infected have long called home.
Ten years ago, the health department of the now-defunct Province of Taiwan ceded the 17-hectare hillside property on which the leper colony is built to Taipei City for the construction of the Hsinchuang MRT line. Without the patients' consent or an assessment report on the site's value as a historical landmark, the 70-year-old sanitarium is to be demolished, and over 300 lepers are to be relocated to the newly-built Huilung Hospital (迴龍醫院).
PHOTO: GEORGE TSORNG, TAIPEI TIMES
Since then, the patients have undergone a decade-long odyssey of petitions to different government agencies -- the Taipei County Government, the Council for Cultural Affairs, the Legislative Yuan and finally the country's highest policy-making body, the Executive Yuan.
Building on the tensions of today's legislative election, the patients berated the incumbent Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for ignoring the human rights values which the DPP vowed to champion.
"Premier Yu Shyi-kun said that he will take good care of the society's minority groups. A-bian also said that human rights are the foundation of our nation. Does forcing us to move respect our rights and show care for our lives?" the 72-year-old leper representative Tung Hsiang-ming (湯祥明) said, while holding a megaphone in his disfigured hands.
Before there was a cure, the Japanese regime sent lepers to Happy Life Sanitarium and would shoot anyone who tried to flee from the secluded world. Despite the fact the Happy Life Sanitarium was open to the public and stopped taking new patients when leprosy became treatable in the 1950s, most of the lepers -- long cut off from society and their families -- chose to stay and live out their lives in the sanitarium built under the Japanese regime.
As for the MRT project, the government planned to relocate over 300 patients to the 8-floor, modern Huilung Hospital.
"But a hospital is a place for a short-term stay, not for a life-long settlement," said the 75-year-old Huang Jing-liang (黃金涼). Huang was sent to the Sanitarium at the age of 14 and spent much of her childhood, adulthood and mid-years in the banyan-sheltered yards there.
Academics and doctors also consider the government's plan both unethical and disrespectful of Taiwan's history.
"Forcing them to move again is equal to a second quarantine, especially to those over 60 whose ability to adapt to a new environment is waning," said Dr. Hung Te-jen (
Although the government promised to preserve the Sanitarium's administration building, scholars contend that the cultural heritage will be lost once the wards are torn down and people are moved.
"What's the use of preserving the administration building but removing the people who are live witnesses to history?" asked Hsia Chu-joe (夏鑄九), professor at the National Taiwan University's Graduate Institute of Building and Planning.
"Once a historical building is removed from its site, it loses its vitality and every bit of it is mummified, like a specimen on display for curious onlookers. If the Happy Life Sanitarium is demolished, all that will be left of Taiwan's public health history will be debris," Hsia added.
The government has not guaranteed to preserve the sanitarium, although negotations are ongoing. Executive Yuan officials told leper representatives that government agencies will not dismantle the sanitarium before an alternative is agreed upon by both sides.
Earlier this year, the Taipei County Government said that the social cost of preserving the sanitarium was too great.
"To change the route of the Hsinchung MRT line in order to preserve the sanitarium will cost more than NT$10 billion and delay the completion date for more than three years," Taipei County Government's Bureau of Culture said in an official letter to the patients.
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of
RSS