The Democratic Progressive Party's liaison officer in Washington, Michael Fonte, has taken issue with the Republican Party's revised description of the US "one China" policy, calling it an "egregious error" that misrepresents Washington's long-term position.
In the platform approved on Monday by the party's presidential nominating convention in New York, the party asserted that "the United States government's policy is that there is one China," a subtle but important change from its 2000 platform, which said that "America has acknowledged the view that there is one China."
While the new document qualifies its statement by asserting that the policy is "reflected in" the three communiques signed by Washington and Beijing in 1972, 1978 and 1982, along with the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, Fonte told the Taipei Times that the statement is still incorrect.
"It is not US policy," he said. "US policy is that we acknowledge the Chinese position that there is one China and Taiwan is a part of China," he said. "While we acknowledge the Chinese position, we demand, and our policy is, that there should be a peaceful, mutually acceptable resolution of the issue of what `one China' is."
He called the difference in wording between the 2000 and 2004 platforms a "very important distinction," because, despite the qualification, "the statement itself is pretty flat: there is one China. That is not the US position."
Fonte noted the criticism the Democratic Party received in July when its platform omitted any reference to the Taiwan Relations Act, and he called for detractors to also criticize the Republicans for its "one China" statement.
"Democrats in certain quarters of the press have been roundly denounced by some groups for not saying anything about the [Taiwan Relations Act]. Well, if you're going to do that, to be even-handed you have to point out the fact that [the Republican statement] is not an error of omission -- it's an error of commission," Fonte said.
Asked why he thought the change had been made, he said he could only "speculate" that "somebody really blew it," since the platforms are carefully thought through before being adopted.
"I don't understand how they could have made such an egregious error," he said.
The Bush administration has never clearly defined its "one China" policy, although it has steadfastly defended it.
The administration's most authoritative and extensive recent statement of policy came on April 21, in testimony by Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia James Kelly before a House International Affairs Committee hearing on the 25th anniversary of the Act.
In his written testimony, Kelly said, the US "remains committed to our one China policy," based on the three Communiques and the Act.
But when asked to define the policy, Kelly was non-committal.
"In my testimony," he allowed, "I made the point `our one China,' and I didn't really define it, and I'm not sure I very easily could define it."
"I can tell you what it is not. It is not the one-China policy or the one-China principle that Beijing suggests, and it may not be the definition that some would have in Taiwan," he said.
"But it does convey a meaning of solidarity of a kind among the people on both sides of the straits [sic] that has been our policy for a very long time." he added.
He also conceded that a "one China" policy has a "degree of contrast" with the evolution of democracy in Taiwan and the emergence of a sense of Taiwanese identity.
More uncertainty was added to the debate in June when the prestigious US-China Economic and Security Review Commission called for Congress and the administration to review the policy "given the changing realities in China and Taiwan."
But the panel never defined the policy and limited its recommendations primarily to a review of US defense assistance to Taiwan and efforts to break Taiwan out of international isolation.
POLAM KOPITIAM CASE: Of the two people still in hospital, one has undergone a liver transplant and is improving, while the other is being evaluated for a liver transplant A fourth person has died from bongkrek acid poisoning linked to the Polam Kopitiam (寶林茶室) restaurant in Taipei’s Far Eastern Sogo Xinyi A13 Department Store, the Ministry of Health and Welfare said yesterday, as two other people remain seriously ill in hospital. The first death was reported on March 24. The man had been 39 years old and had eaten at the restaurant on March 22. As more cases of suspected food poisoning involving people who had eaten at the restaurant were reported by hospitals on March 26, the ministry and the Taipei Department of Health launched an investigation. The Food and
A fourth person has died in a food poisoning outbreak linked to the Xinyi (信義) branch of Malaysian restaurant chain Polam Kopitiam (寶林茶室) in Taipei, Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Victor Wang (王必勝) said on Monday. It was the second fatality in three days, after another was announced on Saturday. The 40-year-old woman experienced multiple organ failure in the early hours on Monday, and the family decided not to undergo emergency resuscitation, Wang said. She initially showed signs of improvement after seeking medical treatment for nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, but her condition worsened due to an infection, he said. Two others who
MEDICAL: The bills would also upgrade the status of the Ethical Guidelines Governing the Research of Human Embryos and Embryonic Stem Cell Research to law The Executive Yuan yesterday approved two bills to govern regenerative medicine that aim to boost development of the field. Taiwan would reach an important milestone in regenerative medicine development with passage of the regenerative medicine act and the regenerative medicine preparations ordinance, which would allow studies to proceed and treatments to be developed, Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Victor Wang (王必勝) told reporters at a news conference after a Cabinet meeting. Regenerative treatments have been used for several conditions, including cancer — by regenerating blood cells — and restoring joint function in soft tissue, Wang said. The draft legislation requires regenerative treatments
Taiwanese should be mindful when visiting China, as Beijing in July is likely to tighten the implementation of policies on national security following the introduction of two regulations, a researcher said on Saturday. China on Friday unveiled the regulations governing the law enforcement and judicial activities of national security agencies. They would help crack down on “illegal” and “criminal” activities that Beijing considers to be endangering national security, according to reports by China’s state media. The definition of what constitutes a national security threat in China is vague, Taiwan Thinktank researcher Wu Se-chih (吳瑟致) said. The two procedural regulations are to provide Chinese