The Council of Grand Justices yesterday gave death-row inmate Hsu Tzu-chiang (
"We affirm the decision by the grand justices and are thankful for the chance to live. We will file the extraordinary appeal as soon as possible," said Greg Yo (
Based on the application filed by Hsu's defense team last December, the grand justices yesterday handed down their decision based on the Interpretation Article 582 of the Constitution. In it, they ruled that a Supreme Court decision to uphold a high court's verdict to sentence Hsu to death was unconstitutional.
"The judges decided to accept Hsu's co-suspects' testimony, in deciding to sentence him to death," Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Fan Kuang-chun (范光群) said.
"However, according to the amended Criminal Code, only witness testimony can be used against a suspect, but a suspect has the right to challenge incriminating witness testimony in court," he added.
In the case, Hsu was convicted based on the testimony of his co-suspects, Huang Chun-chi (黃春棋) and Chen Yi-lung (陳憶龍).
Supreme Court Spokesman Chi Chun-chien (
"This crime was committed in 1995 and Hsu's death penalty was handed down on April 27, 2000. It is not fair to rebut our decision by judging the case with the newly amended law," Chu said.
Hsu was indicted for the September 1995 kidnapping and murder of Huang Chun-shu (黃春樹), based on the testimony of his alleged accomplices. Hsu turned himself in when he realized that he was a suspect.
The argument for Hsu's defense concerns whether his co-suspects' testimony should be used as evidence. One of the co-suspects, surnamed Chen, wrote a confession admitting that he had deliberately incriminated Hsu because he had a grudge against him and hoped to delay his trial. However, the Taiwan High Court decided not to admit this as evidence when it heard Hsu's case, and upheld the death penalty passed down by the lower court.
In refusing to hear Chen's confession, the high court breached Hsu's human rights, his defense team argues. But despite Chen's testimony, the Supreme Court said there was no other evidence to prove Hsu's innocence. As a result, the judges could not suspend his death penalty simply because Chen decided to retract his testimony.
Hsu's defense team petitioned State Public Prosecutor General Lu Jen-fa (盧仁發) to pursue an extraordinary appeal for Hsu on four previous occasions.
Lu finally approved the fifth petition to grant the first extraordinary appeal in 2001, but that appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court on March 21, 2002. After that, Lu filed another slate of appeals to the Supreme Court in May, but all were once again rejected.
Defense counsel petitions cited a Control Yuan investigation report released in January 2001, which concluded Hsu's conviction was flawed and unlawful.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods