Tue, Mar 16, 2004 - Page 2 News List

Wu, DPP officials rebut fugitive

SCUTTLEBUTT Wu Shu-chen said she's willing to take a polygraph test if fugitive Chen Yu-hao returns home to stand trial. Others named by him also rejected his claims

By Chang Yun-ping  /  STAFF REPORTER

A spokesman for first lady Wu Shu-chen (吳淑珍) said yesterday that she was willing to take a polygraph test as long as fugitive tycoon Chen Yu-hao (陳由豪) returns to Taiwan to face justice.

Huang Fang-yen (黃芳彥), the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) campaign finance liaison, speaking on behalf of Wu, again denied the former Tuntex chair-man's allegation that he had visited Wu twice at her former residence on Minsheng East Road and personally offered the money to her.

Reacting to Chen's demand that Wu take a polygraph test to prove she has not lied about his visits, Huang said: "The first lady said she is willing to be investigated as long as Chen returns to Taiwan to face a judicial investigation."

In response to Chen's allegation that the DPP had received a total of NT$20.3 million in donations from him, and not just the NT$10 million the party claims to have received, Secretary General to the Presidential Office Chiou I-jen (邱義仁), also executive director of the DPP election campaign, said yesterday that Chen's allegations "were nothing new and are boring."

"All the allegations Chen has made still revolve around the same NT$10 million we received. The additional NT$10 million and NT$300,000 Chen claims [to have given] are based on the invoices and a receipt we gave him. But actually they were from the same amount of money," Chiou said.

The invoices were issued by a restaurant and an advertising company which ran campaign affairs for the DPP in 2000.

"We asked the restaurant and the ad company to make out the invoices to Tuntex in order to provide a statement of the company's expenses. Therefore, the invoices simply prove that Chen only gave us NT$10 million," Chiou said.

"The DPP was the one that paid the expenses to the restaurant and the ad company," he said.

Political parties are not required to issue receipts to their donors.

The DPP asked the restaurant and ad company to issue the invoices in order to help Tuntex keep a record of its expenses, Chiou said.

The NT$300,000 receipt was issued to Tuntex for tax purposes. By law, the maximum donation a company can use to offset its taxes is NT$300,000.

Deputy Secretary General to the Presidential Office Chen Che-nan (陳哲男) also refuted Chen Yu-hao's allegations that he had taken NT$10 million in bribes in order to help extend a low interest rate for a loan made by Tuntex.

He said that the fugitive's allegations were contradictory.

"Chen [Yu-hao] first said that he met with me five times in 2001, but today he said he gave me NT$10 million when he met with me in September 2000," Chen Che-nan said.

Council for Economic Planning and Development Vice Chairman Chang Ching-sen (張景森) also said the tycoon's accusations were inconsistent. Chen Yu-hao has said Chang took NT$1 million from him.

"Since the publication of Chen's three letters accusing me of taking his money, I have been honest in facing the whole thing. His accusations were contradictory. First he said the money he gave me was put in three different bags, but today he said the money was put in one blue bag. This proves Chen's [Yu-hao] accusations were groundless," Chang said.

DPP Legislator Chang Ching-fang (張清芳) yesterday rebutted the fugitive's claim that he meddled with the bidding for the construction of the Tatan thermal power plant in Taoyuan.

The former Tuntex chairman claimed that the legislator sent his assistant to meet the president of Tung Ting Gas Corp to talk about bidding for the power plant. He played a 57-minute tape that he claimed was a recording of the conversation between the assistant, Chen Wen-li (陳文豊), and Tung Ting's president, showing that the lawmaker tried to pressure the company to gain money from the project.

This story has been viewed 4716 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top