For years, Master Yuan Ling (
"What we're asking for isn't very much. We've waited so long and still no progress has been made," Master Yuan Ling said.
PHOTO: CHEN CHENG-CHANG, TAIPEI TIMES
And while he has waited for the restoration's approval, the government has gradually moved in on the land surrounding the temple, even after the tower was designated a municipal historic landmark in 1997.
The city's Bureau of Cultural Affairs has been reviewing plans for the restoration, but say that until their review is completed, money for the project cannot be dispensed.
"We'll start the second round of the reviewing process next Wednesday. If everything goes well, the restoration project should be completed in July," Li Bin (李斌), deputy director of the cultural affairs bureau, said.
In response, Taipei City Councilor Lee Hsin (
"Since the City Council has already approved the NT$24 million budget for the restoration of the bell tower, there's no point in withholding the money," Lee said.
"Historical landmarks are the roots of every culture. If they're not well taken care of, the culture is a rootless one," Lee said.
Construction on the temple complex, located at the intersection of Linsen South Road and Jenai Road, first began in 1908. It originally covered an area of 4,500 pings (or 14,850m2) and consisted of the Soto Zen Center (曹洞宗台北別院), the Kuanyin Zen House (觀音禪堂), the Taipei Junior High School (台北中學), and the bell tower.
The bell tower and the Tung Ho Zen Temple are the only two remaining buildings in the complex. The temple was originally called the the Kuanyin Zen House, and was renamed in 1946, about the same time that the complex and the land it was built on were donated by the Japanese colonial owners to the temple's former master, Master Hsin Yuan (心源老師父).
The central government tried to acquire the land from Master Hsin. But Hsin remained unwilling to part with the complex, so cultural officials had to wait until April 1970, one month after the 89-year-old master died.
Since it took-over, the area of the complex has gradually shrunk to 700 pings (or 2,310 m2) due to a large number of illegal buildings.
The most recent encroachment on the temple's land is a new bathroom pink 10-floor building called the Taipei Municipal Youth Recreation Center (台北市立青少年育樂中心), 50m away from the bell tower.
The center cost the city over NT$1 billion to build and is slated to be opened to the public in July. Meanwhile, Master Yuan Ling's temple and the bell tower continue to deteriorate.
While the 71-year-old tower was designated a municipal historical landmark in 1997, the city has failed to take any rehabilitative action, doing little to maintain the Japanese-style two-story building. The building is now filled with only dead birds and their droppings.
PFP lawmaker Chu has called on the city's Bureau of Cultural Affairs (
"I'm very curious to know why the city has failed to prohibit construction in the perimeter around the bell tower," Chu said.
The Cultural Heritage Preservation Law (
Officials of the city's Bureau of Education (
Master Yuan also wonders why in the world the bell tower was declared a historical landmark, but the temple was not.
"I don't know why the 84-year-old temple is considered less important than the 71-year-old bell tower," he said.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s