Following the recent publication of a New Zealander's account of the 228 Incident and the donation of the original manuscript to the 228 Memorial Museum, critics say the third-party account of the atrocities serves as a unique opportunity for the general public to reflect on the horrors of the past.
Colin Shackleton donated his father's manuscript of his book Formosa Calling to the 228 Memorial Museum on Saturday -- more than five decades after his father Allan James Shackleton wrote about his post-war experiences in Taiwan as a UN rehabilitation officer.
The manuscript describes how the Chinese moved to Taiwan after the KMT's defeat in the Chinese Civil War, how they pillaged the industrial society created by the Japanese on Taiwan and the corruption he witnessed among KMT troops.
After the KMT's arrival in Taiwan (usually, at the time, referred to as the Nationalists), "the Formosans soon found that property was not safe when soldiers were about and that they had no redress at law for any robbery committed by the military," Shackleton wrote in the manuscript.
Lap Phok-bun (
"This is the kind of book that was banned from publication for more than 50 years. More than 50 years later, it has come to light," he added, displaying the Mandarin version of the account, which was published in Taiwan last June.
The English version was only published in 1998.
Unexpected discovery
Before 1997, nobody except Shackleton's family members knew of the existence of the unpublished manuscript, which had been kept in a metal cabin trunk mixed with other documents relating to his experience during WWI.
"After he died, we went through the trunk, and threw out just about everything. But we kept Formosa Calling, and got it moved up into the study into a filing cabinet. It got `promoted,'" said Jenny, Colin Shackleton's wife.
"It's an important part of father's life, so I couldn't have possibly destroyed it," said Colin. Even so, Allan Shackleton's descendents considered the manuscript merely as a family keepsake.
"We didn't consider it important. We thought it's just our family history and that nobody else would be interested," said Jenny.
It was an unexpected telephone call from a stranger in 1997 that changed the fate of the manu-script.
"When I called Colin the first time, he sounded shocked," said Stanley Liao (
Liao said that when preparing an event in New Zealand to mark the 50th anniversary of the 228 Incident in 1997, a friend told him of two New Zealanders he could contact for related materials.
Liao's friend said that George Kerr had mentioned two New Zealanders, Allan James Shackleton and Louise Tomsett, in his 1965 book Formosa Betrayed as sources he consulted about the events of 1947.
Making numerous phone calls, Liao found out that Tomsett, though still alive in Sydney, had suffered a stroke and was unable to speak. Tomsett communicated with Liao via fax to say that all her related files had been lost.
Liao's search for the Shackleton family yielded mixed results. The bad news was that Allan had died in 1984. The good news was that he had left behind him an unpublished manuscript.
"I had absolutely no idea about the manuscript whatsoever before I made the phone call," Liao said.
Liao said it took him sometime to shake off Colin's suspicion about his proposal that the manuscript should be published.
Colin admitted that he was very "careful" when talking to Liao the first few times.
Colin recalled his father's warning given to him in the mid-1980s before the old man passed away.
"Father had once told me, `be very careful, Colin, if you ever go to Taiwan. You may be put in jail on account of the manuscript.' The name Shackleton would be persona non grata in Taiwan because father was known to be against the [KMT] regime," he said.
"So I thought if somebody wanted the manuscript, it could be dangerous," he added, laughing, sitting in his hotel room in downtown Taipei on Thursday evening during his first visit to Taiwan.
Colin said it was Liao's explanation about how limited the related information was that made him change his mind.
"We didn't realize that history was being lost and the document was valuable as a result ... So when [Liao] wanted to have it published, we agreed," he said.
In fact, back at the time when Allan Shackleton endeavored to write about what he witnessed and attempted to have the manuscript published, neither his wife Mildred nor publishers appreciated his effort.
Third party account
But more than a decade after Allan passed away, his battle to publish his account of the bloody uprising in Taiwan was finally won, although it is a delayed victory. When the Mandarin version of the book was published in Taiwan last June, historians like Wu Mi-cha (
Wu, a specialist in Taiwan history at National Taiwan University, said Shackleton's book offered locals a fresh angle on the 1947 tragedy.
"But for these accounts made by foreigners as third parties to the incident, all one can only hear in Taiwan are arguments between victims and persecutors," Wu said.
"Relatives of the victims of the incident will accuse the KMT of atrocities, while the KMT nowadays would say it's a tragedy that happened in the past and they had no part in any misdeeds. A third-party account such as this could enable us to shake off that constraint in looking at history," he said.
He also said third-party accounts would counter government attempts to erase the past.
"These accounts of the events surrounding the incident were valuable because they helped prevent the KMT's attempts to cover up the atrocities. And more than 50 years later, the publication of Shackleton's book can also prevent the KMT from trying to erase memories of past horrors," he added.
As Colin said, "if [the book] helps with the reconciliation process, then it would be of great benefit to the people of Taiwan."
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
Taiwan is still in the process of assessing the possibility of recruiting workers from Eswatini, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said yesterday, adding that its goal is to help Eswatini upgrade its vocational training centers. If there are plans to recruit workers from Eswatini, safeguarding national security, protecting public health and ensuring the employment rights of Taiwanese would be prerequisites, Department of West Asian and African Affairs Director-General Yen Chia-liang (顏嘉良) told a news conference. Key considerations would also include filling labor shortages in specific industries, and fostering bilateral professional and technical exchanges, he said. Yen was asked about the progress of labor
A US uncrewed surface vessel (USV) encountered multiple Chinese warships during an autonomous transit of the Taiwan Strait, US defense company Seasats said in a statement on Wednesday. Seasats announced that a Lightfish USV had completed the first autonomous transit of the Taiwan Strait. Over five days, the USV traversed the entire length of the Strait while constantly monitoring surface vessel traffic, the company said. The Lightfish encountered multiple Chinese warships, one of which was a Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) Type 056 corvette, it said. The Chinese vessels were operating “well within Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone without transmitting their identity via the
The nation’s usually punctual high-speed rail system yesterday was hit by major disruptions after all scheduled services were canceled and replaced with three hourly trains offering only non-reserved seating, affecting more than 200,000 passengers. Preliminary findings indicate the disruption was caused by a faulty power module in a track switch control cabinet, Taiwan High-Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) said, adding that as a full system inspection could only be conducted after operations end for the day, a decision on whether normal service would resume today would be announced before the first train departs. During a routine inspection early yesterday, a switch signal abnormality