Fifty-three years on, the events surrounding the 228 Incident of February 1947 still poison Taiwan's ethnic harmony.
The clash was primarily between mainlanders coming across from China in the aftermath of WWII and Taiwanese, whose ancestors had settled in Taiwan during earlier waves of migration.
A museum has been built as have memorials all over the island to commemorate the people who were killed or went missing during the violence of the events, but reconciliation still proves elusive.
PHOTO: GEORGE TSORNG AND CHIANG YING-YING, TAIPEI TIMESN
"If the public and the government see the 228 Incident as only a commemoration rather than as a starting point for the review of Taiwan's history, we will never learn the lessons [the event has to teach]," said National Taiwan University (NTU) historian Li Yung-chih (李永熾).
Facing up to history
Files referring to the 228 Incident were not released by the government until 1993 when the first official report -- A Research Report on 228 Incident (二二八事件研究報告), written by five historians -- was issued.
Some historians said that the report, which outlined the events that took place, was just the beginning.
"In terms of history, I don't think the government review was sufficiently careful," said Li, adding that a sense of "right and wrong" and the lessons the event might teach future generations were missing in the document.
However, the authors of the official report believe that the moral dimension is superfluous, saying that people make progress by learning from their mistakes.
"Since the government has apologized to victims' families, the priority for us now should be to eliminate the misunderstanding left by the tragedy between the two groups -- mainlanders and Taiwanese," said Huang Fu-san (黃富三), historian from the Academia Sinica and co-author of the official report.
Mutual suspicion
Huang said that the 228 Incident could be attributed to the different living standards in China and Taiwan at the time.
"Taiwanese were disappointed by the undisciplined and lawless troops from China," said Huang, adding that Taiwanese had by then been schooled in honesty and civic virtue by the Japanese colonial government.
Huang said that the two groups, mainlanders and Taiwanese, had been inadvertantly hurting each other's interests when the 228 Incident burst out in 1947, and the military repression that followed resulted in more misunderstanding and conflict.
"Mainlanders had access to more resources because [government] policies favored them," said Huang. "This established the superiority of the migrant mainlanders over Taiwanese."
Huang said that it was understandable that some Taiwanese held a grudge against mainlanders.
"The loss of many key [government] files, such as those relating to the many intellectuals killed during the 228 Incident, has resulted in a strong distrust of both the government and mainlanders," Huang said.
Some historians say the mutual suspicion that exists between the two ethnic groups has become an obstacle to consensus on Taiwan's identity -- whether it should be an independent country or just a part of China -- and this has not helped harmony among groups living in Taiwan.
"When mainlanders, who feel insecure, don't trust Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) because of his Taiwanese background, some Taiwanese advocate Taiwan independence based on memories left by the 228 Incident and later the White Terror (白色恐怖, a witch-hunt for political dissidents)," said Huang.
Honest history
Some historians suggest that uncovering and facing up to the facts of history is the only way out.
"Since the government, society and the media, have never had a clear interpretation of precisely what the White Terror was, the real face of history was hidden for decades," said NTU historian Li.
"Nowadays every political figure, when under pressure from others, always claims that he or she is a victim of `political persecution,' but this is nonsense," Li said, adding that the countless victims of political persecution were arrested without evidence and sentenced secretly after the 228 Incident.
"It's ironic that James Soong (宋楚瑜, an independent presidential candidate), who claimed that telephone lines at his campaign centers were wire-tapped, called himself a victim of the White Terror, Li said, adding that the White Terror created an atmosphere of fear.
"Ubiquitous monitoring networks setup by intelligence units confined people both spiritually and physically, and made them fear to say a word about politics," Li said.
Giving Taiwan priority
Li suggested that textbooks have to be revised to provide future generations with a deeper understanding of Taiwan's history.
"If the government could face the history, with all its right and wrong decisions and tell our children the truth, then future generations living on the island would not feel so confused," Li said, adding that Taiwan should be given priority over China in this process.
Historian Huang from the Academia Sinica agrees with Li, saying that stressing the history of Taiwan in textbooks would adjust long-term aberrations in Taiwan's history education.
"The differences among groups in Taiwan could push progress forward as long as all groups, mainlanders, Taiwanese, Hakka people and Aborigines all identify themselves as an important part of this land," Huang said. "Every group should be confident that its existence in Taiwan is a positive factor."
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s