"Your cheatin' heart" might tell on you, as the song says, but in Taiwan it can also land you in jail. Taiwan might be the only country left in the world where adultery is not only grounds for divorce but a criminal offense punishable by a jail sentence of up to 12 months.
In practice, few are jailed; a sentence is usually commutable to a fine of around NT$900 for each day of jail time handed out.
The question that legal scholars are now dealing with, however, is whether, as Taiwan enters a new century, the criminalization of adultery is an outdated concept which should be scrapped.
But a range of interests is stacked against altering the law, from women's groups that believe criminalization is a weapon against erring husbands that Taiwan's women -- often legally disadvantaged in family-related matters -- would be loath to lose, to private detectives who make a good living from adultery cases.
Much of the business for private detectives comes from wives of suspected adulterers who either want to obtain a divorce or to force their husband's mistress out and win their "stray" husbands back.
In fact, the law itself encourages such happy endings -- getting couples "back together" -- by allowing accusers to drop adultery charges against their spouses, while at the same time allowing the charge to be sustained against the "intruders."
Ironically, despite the fact that use of the law is generally initiated by wives against their husbands, at one time the law allowed criminal liability for adultery only against women. Such legal discrimination is, to this day, still cited by women's rights activists, as reflecting the values of a society where it is common for a man to have sexual relationships outside of marriage.
The law was eventually changed to treat men and women adulterers equally and now it is viewed as an "effective weapon" by women today.
Opponents say it is "savage" to put someone in jail for adultery and have long called for the law's abolition.
But many women support the idea that the law protects "good" people who are loyal to their marriage and punishes those who betray their marriage vows.
While the debate on decriminalization has gone on for years, both proponents and opponents of the law are far from reaching common ground.
The court's perspective
Although adultery is punishable by a jail sentence, few adulterers have actually been sent to prison. More often than not, the court allows one found guilty of adultery to escape with a fines of "equal" value to the jail sentence.
In general, adultery can result in both criminal and civil liabilities. It also constitutes legal grounds for requesting a divorce via the court.
The majority of cases involve an alleged adulterer being subjected to a criminal trial. And along with a divorce request based on the fault of adultery often comes a request of compensation for mental distress caused by the adultery.
Huang Ja-lei (
He said, however, that chances are that the marriage is hurt even more once the charge is filed and the charge is itself detrimental to a couple's reconciliation .
"Many women thought they could get their husbands back by taking [a case] to court. They tried to make a deal, promising to drop the charge as long as the husband came back," Huang said. "But in reality, most of them would only regret it when they realize the court can't help love to continue."
Huang said that while some use the criminal charge as a means of protecting their own marriages, others use it as a "weapon" which often forces the cheating spouse to offer more in a divorce agreement in terms of the distribution of property.
"It works," Huang said. "Lots of people feel it's very disgraceful to have a criminal record tagged on them. And they would rather give more to avoid the tagging."
What women say
A few years ago, the Ministry of Justice recommended the decriminalization of adultery, but it was not able to push the change through in the face of strong opposition from the public, particularly married women.
While public support for decriminalization is gradually increasing, even so, the change might be some time in coming.
"We've found more and more women do accept that adultery is not a crime. They might admit [criminalization] is a mean wea-pon; nevertheless it's still their belief that their rights can be secured better with that weapon to hand," according to Yang Fang-wan (
Yang said it is indisputable that everyone is free to love and to be loved. She said, however, one cannot make judgements about the issue without considering the reality that many women will not be able to survive, emotionally or financially, after a divorce.
"Those loyal to their marriage are supposed to be the good people the law should protect. It's not easy for them to come to terms with the idea that the betrayer of the marriage can get away with it so easily," Yang said.
"Love is free and it's neither right or wrong. But it's really difficult for these women, who have dedicated themselves to their marriage, to accept they have to take the pain caused by the fault of their spouse," she said.
From a practical point of view, Yang said, the existing divorce law does not give enough protection to women on property rights after the divorce. The government has started working on amending the law on distribution of property between divorcing spouses under pressure from women groups. "Until legal protection is better established for women, we don't think the time is right to decriminalize adultery. At the very least, it serves as an effective weapon to force cheating husbands to offer more financial support to their divorcing wives," Yang said.
Scholarly perspectives
Adultery remained a crime in West Germany until 1969. The German decision to decriminalize adultery was generally based on the fact that there were only a small number of adultery prosecutions, sentences delivered for the crime seemed often too lenient and most importantly, there was a danger that the adultery charge was used simply to get revenge.
Legal scholars in Taiwan have long argued that the reasoning behind the German decision could be applied equally to Taiwan. Adult-ery, they believe, is a civil issue, not a criminal one in which the power of the government should intervene.
Scholars have especially criticized the use of the charge as a weapon to obtain more from a divorce agreement.
"We feel a lot of sympathy for those women who might have difficulties surviving after the divorce. But the law should not punish anyone, only to help others get better deals in a divorce," said Huang Jung-chien (
"We can understand how difficult it is for them to come to terms with the fact that love is not there anymore. But there is no reason at all to use criminal liabilities against the adulterers just to keep their spouses from feeling emotional pain," he said.
Despite persistent opposition to the decriminalization of adultery, Huang appeared optimistic about future developments.
"Taiwanese society is changing quickly. Sooner or later, I think this idea will be accepted by the majority," he said.
POLITICAL AGENDA: Beijing’s cross-strait Mid-Autumn Festival events are part of a ‘cultural united front’ aimed at promoting unification with Taiwan, academics said Local authorities in China have been inviting Taiwanese to participate in cross-strait Mid-Autumn Festival celebrations centered around ideals of “family and nation,” a move Taiwanese academics said politicizes the holiday to promote the idea of “one family” across the Taiwan Strait. Sources said that China’s Fujian Provincial Government is organizing about 20 cross-strait-themed events in cities including Quanzhou, Nanping, Sanming and Zhangzhou. In Zhangzhou, a festival scheduled for Wednesday is to showcase Minnan-language songs and budaixi (布袋戲) glove puppetry to highlight cultural similarities between Taiwan and the region. Elsewhere, Jiangsu Province is hosting more than 10 similar celebrations in Taizhou, Changzhou, Suzhou,
The Republic of China (ROC) is celebrating its 114th Double Ten National Day today, featuring military parades and a variety of performances and speeches in front of the Presidential Office in Taipei. The Taiwan Taiko Association opened the celebrations with a 100-drummer performance, including young percussionists. As per tradition, an air force Mirage 2000 fighter jet flew over the Presidential Office as a part of the performance. The Honor Guards of the ROC and its marching band also heralded in a military parade. Students from Taichung's Shin Min High School then followed with a colorful performance using floral imagery to represent Taiwan's alternate name
COGNITIVE WARFARE: Chinese fishing boats transmitting fake identification signals are meant to test Taiwan’s responses to different kinds of perceived incursions, a report said Chinese vessels are transmitting fake signals in Taiwan’s waters as a form of cognitive warfare, testing Taipei’s responses to various types of incursions, a report by the Institute for the Study of War said on Friday. Several Chinese fishing vessels transmitted fake automatic identification system (AIS) signals in Taiwan’s waters last month, with one mimicking a Russian warship and another impersonating a Chinese law enforcement vessel, the report said. Citing data from Starboard Maritime Intelligence, the report said that throughout August and last month, the Chinese fishing boat Minshiyu 06718 (閩獅漁06718) sailed through the Taiwan Strait while intermittently transmitting its own AIS
CHINESE INFILTRATION: Medical logistics is a lifeline during wartime and the reported CCP links of a major logistics company present a national security threat, an expert said The government would bolster its security check system to prevent China from infiltrating the nation’s medical cold chain, a national security official said yesterday. The official, who wished to stay anonymous, made the remarks after the Chinese-language magazine Mirror Media (鏡周刊) reported that Pharma Logistics (嘉里醫藥物流) is in charge of the medical logistics of about half of the nation’s major hospitals, including National Taiwan University Hospital and Taipei Veterans General Hospital. The company’s parent, Kerry TJ Logistics Co (嘉里大榮物流), is associated with the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the
RSS