New Party legislator Hsieh Chi-ta's (
But critics said although the strategy may relieve some of the intense pressure on Soong (
As soon as Hsieh publicly announced on Friday she would set up a special task force to investigate the allegations of financial misdeeds -- saying Soong should talk less about money and more about policy -- Soong almost immediately restored scheduled rallies and other events meant to boost his signature drive, which began Saturday in Hualien (花蓮) County.
Before Friday, Soong had only appeared in public to defend himself or to attack his detractors.
At his first rally on Dec. 20, after KMT legislator Yang Chi-hsiung's (
"In the controversy surrounding the Chung Hsing Bills Finance accounts, both myself and the KMT are the interested parties, but now, the KMT government seems to be playing the role of judge and jury at the same time," Soong said.
"The KMT is already combined with the current government administration, and has paved the way for the whole `truth' using bogus information.
"The KMT has degraded the finance ministry into nothing more than a tool for high ranking officials," Soong added.
In the cross-fire between both the KMT and the government, Soong said he has no option but to delegate what he said was a "third party" to conduct an "impartial" survey regarding the alleged money scandal.
The main reason for recommending Hsieh, Soong said, was for her clean-cut image and legal expertise, since Hsieh has served as a judge for over 10 years.
But opposition critics and academics took issue with Soong's choice, challenging both the motives and actions Hsieh's delegation have taken.
DPP National Assembly deputy Chiang Chao-I (
"Hsieh should not blow her delegation out of proportion. There is no legitimate basis for which Hsieh can claim she is acting on behalf of the public to seek the truth," Chang said.
DPP legislative caucus leader Chen Chi-mai (
"Soong said he has fully authorized Hsieh to probe financial transactions during the past eight years. But he appears to have conveniently ignored the fact that Hsieh is inclined to favor his campaign,'' Chen said.
Chen said based on that logic, the invitation should be open to others.
"Can the DPP then team up with academics to ask Soong if they can also assist in the inquiry?" Chen asked.
Andrew Yen (
"Is there any room for justice to survive here?" he asked, suggesting Hsieh has already abused her office's authority.
"First of all, as a legislator, according to current law, she has no investigative authority, and has no right to demand that the finance ministry provide any materials," Yen said.
"Even if she had the authority, as a personal representative for Soong she could never force the finance ministry to hand over transaction data. On the contrary, finance officials are fully justified in sticking to their principles of privacy,'' Yen added.
Yen also pointed out that since Hsieh has specialized in the legal profession, she of all people should restrain herself from going beyond what the law allows.
Yen said it is obvious from listening to Soong that his strategy is to try to turn the spotlight away from the disputed financial dealings and away from the question of whether he broke the the law.
However, even if Soong can divert the focus for the time being, he will still be forced to face what appears to be a solid legal accusation from either the KMT or the Investigation Bureau.
Both groups have now become involved in the investigation process in one step, while the KMT has said it is considering the possibility of suing Soong for illegally taking party property (
Still, according to the latest opinion poll conducted by Soong's own camp, which continues to insist the entire scandal was masterminded by both the KMT and finance officials, has indicated their responses have had some positive effect, and that Soong could maintain his core base of support of roughly around 30 percent.
"After Soong's second press conference on Dec. 17 night, his popularity rate returned to the lead position again [among the three leading candidates]. We have every reason to believe things will get better and better," said one campaign official, who preferred anonymity.
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday that China using armed force against Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, allowing the country to mobilize the Japanese armed forces under its security laws. Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session yesterday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan’s Asahi Shimbun. "If warships are used and other armed actions are involved, I believe this could constitute a survival- threatening
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS