At least four bills that could act as an "emergency decree law" have been proposed by legislators as of yesterday, in reaction to the emergency decree declared by President Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) in the aftermath of the 921 earthquake.
But at least one legal expert said yesterday that such a law is unnecessary, unless the Constitution is amended to allow for substantial restrictions to be placed on such decrees.
Partly at the urging of lawmakers from both the ruling and opposition parties, President Lee issued an emergency decree on Sept. 25, four days after the deadly earthquake which killed more than 2,400 people and destroyed or damaged more than 80,000 houses. The decree took effect immediately, as the Constitution allows, and was later ratified almost unanimously by the legislature.
Soon thereafter, however, opposition lawmakers began complaining that the emergency decree had resulted in an abuse of power by the executive branch. They claimed that the Executive Yuan was taking advantage of the vagueness of the decree and expanding its power without any necessary checks and balances being put in place.
As a counter-measure, opposition legislators have proposed at least four draft versions of a emergency decree law. The most recent has been co-sponsored by DPP lawmakers Hung Chi-chang (
The trio claimed yesterday that to clarify a decree's authority and responsibilities, an emergency law within the boundaries of the Constitution should be passed by the legislature to regulate its implementation.
Legislators Shen Fu-hsiung (
But according to the Constitution, it is not necessary to write a law covering the emergency decree, said Su Yung-chin (蘇永欽), a law professor at National Chengchi University.
"It is not impermissible to have such a law ," Su said "but if it is to be done within the Constitution, there will be no point, as such a law can only regulate administrative formats and procedures, but not anything substantial as to what the government can or cannot do," he said.
If only for means of procedure, current laws are sufficient, he said. An article in the Constitution originally specified that an emergency decree must be preceded by an emergency decree law, but that article was later frozen by an amendment to the Constitution in 1991. The amendment stipulates that the president can issue an emergency decree to deal with emergency situations, without any specification on what should be done except that the decree should be rectified by the legislature.
Thus, it would be unconstitutional if the legislature wrote an emergency decree law that substantially restricts the power the president and the administrative branch of the government, Su said.
Admittedly, it is a legitimate concern that the administrative branch could have too much power under the current Constitution, Su said. However, to address this concern, the Constitution needs to be amended, he said.
As a matter of fact, Lee Wen-chung said, he and his colleagues recognize the constitutional shortcoming, and they called yesterday for an amendment to the Constitution to properly cover the emergency decree.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS