Sun, Feb 26, 2017 page1

• NTU to fire two professors accused of academic fraud

  • By Sean Lin / Staff reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  National Taiwan University (NTU) yesterday released stage-two investigation results on an academic fraud scandal involving professor Kuo Min-liang (郭明良), which saw the university move to fire Kuo and professor Chang Cheng-chi (張正琪), while clearing NTU president Yang Pan-chyr (楊泮池), who cowrote four problematic papers published by Kuo’s team.

  Two internal investigation teams and an investigation committee comprising members from outside the institution found that Kuo’s research team presented a host of misleading images in six papers, of which two have been retracted by science journals Nature Cell Biology and the Journal of Biological Chemistry.

  The sheer number of problematic images was proof that Kuo “purposefully” added them to the papers, the report said.

  

  National Taiwan University vice president Kuo Tei-wei talks to reporters in Taipei yesterday as the university released investigation results into on academic fraud scandal.

  Photo: Hsiao Yu-hsin, Taipei Times

  The problems manifested in 2006, when Kuo — as the papers’ corresponding author — was responsible for supervising research work, but he chose to neglect the issue and involved a number of his graduate, doctoral and postdoctoral researchers in the presentation of more errors, it said.

  The university decided to dismiss Kuo, who should assume “the greatest and ultimate responsibility,” it said.

  Chang, whose name was absent from the first-stage investigation results, duplicated and improperly edited several images in four papers, including the 2008 article, of which she was the lead author, the investigation found.

  She has been disqualified as a professor, dismissed, barred from re-applying for a teaching position at the university for five years and prohibited from requesting research grants from the school for five years.

  Yang, who coauthored four problematic papers, “bears no responsibility” for the falsified data presented in the papers and therefore “has no reason to resign,” the university said.

  In a 19-page report, the committee said Yang only provided some general advice on the direction of the research and his clinical insights on the four papers.

  Yang’s involvement was limited to the parts he contributed and coauthors were responsible for checking their contributions to the paper, the committee said.

  “By a vote of six to zero, our committee concluded that, based on Ministry of Science and Technology regulations, Dr Yang bears no responsibility for the manipulated figures that mainly involve immunoblots,” the committee said.

  One of the questions the committee said it assessed was whether Yang should resign in the way former Minister of Education Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧) did over an academic misconduct scandal 2014.

  The question has been raised by educators who called for Yang to step down.

  Chiang was unknowingly listed by his former student Chen Cheng-wu (陳震武) as a coauthor in a fake online peer review ring Chen helped create in an attempt to have work published by international journals.

  Yang’s case fundamentally differs from the earlier case in the nature and the magnitude of the offense, the committee said.

  “Therefore, we feel that it is inappropriate to suggest that, based on this earlier case, President Yang should resign,” it said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Investors diversify from TSMC to other winners of AI boom

  • 2

    HSR malfunction causes delays, reduced service

  • 3

    Japan ‘mystery illness’ not new: CDC

  • 4

    Taiwan eyes 100,000 drones a month

  • 5

    Taiwan, China coast guards argue in South China Sea