Several hundred activists last night gathered in Taipei’s Liberty Square for an event commemorating the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre in Beijing, condemning continued human rights abuses by the Chinese government.
Organized by the Student Workshop for Promoting China’s Democracy, the New School for Democracy, the Friends of Liu Xiabo (劉曉波) and the National Taiwan University Student Council, and with the support of a handful of local human rights groups, the event’s site was symbolic, as it was the location of important student demonstrations during Taiwan’s democratization, including an overnight rally on June 3, 1989, in support of the protesters in Tiananmen Square in Beijing.
Lights were dimmed and several moments of silence were observed for the massacre victims, with last night’s event marked by songs interspersed with speeches by several prominent overseas activists, along with Taiwanese human rights figures, who at one point took to the stage holding photographs of political prisoners.
Photo: Chiang Ying-ying, AP
“The spirit of Tiananmen is extremely important to us Tibetans, because we also have been oppressed,” said Lukar Jam, an activist with the Gu-Chu-Sum Movement of Tibet who flew in from India for the event. “The struggle against authoritarianism cuts across nationality and citizenship.”
Wuer Kaixi, an ethnic Uyghur political dissident who participated in the 1989 Tiananmen protests, said President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) statement yesterday about the massacre was “disappointing,” because it used “incident,” not “massacre” to refer to the event.
He said “incident” echoed official Chinese government terminology downplaying Tiananmen’s severity, adding that Tsai saying that she did not desire to “point fingers” at China’s political system was also disappointing.
Photo: RITCHIE B. TONGO, EPA
“We have never felt that China’s democratization was the responsibility of Taiwan and Hong Kong, but China’s democratization would absolutely serve as a guarantee of Taiwan’s and Hong Kong’s democracy, so pushing forward China’s democracy is a project we can work on together,” Wuer Kaixi said.
“The issue of Tiananmen should not be something that separates people who identify as Taiwanese or Chinese,” he said, adding that the absence of Chinese students from yesterday’s event might be the result of a message by the event’s organizers.
Event coordinator Chou Ching-chang (周慶昌), a member of the Student Workshop for Promoting China’s Democracy, said that “three to five” Chinese students had volunteered behind the scenes, attributing the low participation to the event’s sensitivity, while other activists said Chinese students organized another event at Shih Chien University in Taipei.
While the annual Tiananmen memorial event was originally hosted by the Bound with Blood Friends of the Mainland Democratic Movement, which emphasizes common “Chinese” ethnicity, in recent years the event’s focus has shifted to emphasizing universal human rights concerns with a broad “pan-green” participation.
“While back in the day you could make appeals to patriotism, Chinese nationalism does not have the same attraction anymore,” Taiwan Human Rights Association secretary-general Chiu E-ling (邱伊翎) said.
Representatives from the Democratic Progressive Party were notably absent from the event, which featured speakers from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the Green Party Taiwan, the Social Democratic Party and the New Power Party, with Chou attributing their absence to the short notice given by the organizers, whom he said invited political representatives only last week because of “rushed” preparations.
Activists said that the event’s planning was thrown into disarray by the withdrawal of the Taiwan Association for China Human Rights, which had previously provided half of the event’s funding.
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
‘TROUBLEMAKER’: Most countries believe that it is China — rather than Taiwan — that is undermining regional peace and stability with its coercive tactics, the president said China should restrain itself and refrain from being a troublemaker that sabotages peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks after China Coast Guard vessels sailed into disputed waters off the Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in Taiwan — following a remark Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made regarding Taiwan. Takaichi during a parliamentary session on Nov. 7 said that a “Taiwan contingency” involving a Chinese naval blockade could qualify as a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, and trigger Tokyo’s deployment of its military for defense. Asked about the escalating tensions
INTERCEPTION: The 30km test ceiling shows that the CSIST is capable of producing missiles that could stop inbound missiles as they re-enter the atmosphere Recent missile tests by the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology (CSIST) show that Taiwan’s missiles are capable of intercepting ballistic missiles as they re-enter the atmosphere and pose a significant deterrent to Chinese missile threats, former Hsiung Feng III missile development project chief engineer Chang Cheng (張誠) said yesterday. The military-affiliated institute has been conducting missile tests, believed to be related to Project Chiang Kung (強弓) at Pingtung County’s Jiupeng Military Base, with many tests deviating from past practices of setting restriction zones at “unlimited” and instead clearly stating a 30.48km range, Chang said. “Unlimited” restrictions zones for missile tests is