A legislative committee session yesterday sputtered into gridlock as legislators and government officials sparred over legal language in proposed amendments to limit air pollution, prompting several legislators to accuse the authorities of being nonchalant about potential health hazards posed by factory emissions.
The session focused on capping factory-emitted PM2.5 — airborne pollutants measuring less than 2.5 micrometers — identified as a carcinogen by the WHO and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
An amendment proposed by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lin Shu-fen (林淑芬) said that if the annual concentrations of air pollutants — ozone, PM10 and PM2.5 — gauged in a municipality exceeds the annual standard stipulated by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) for three years in a row, that municipality shall be designated a “level 3” air pollution prevention zone, meaning air quality in the region is in breach of emission standards.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
Furthermore, if a municipality records subpar air quality for five consecutive years, it alone — or together with its neighbors — shall be designated an overall emission control zone, which would prohibit the establishment of new factories unless proprietors obtain emission quotas granted to existing plants by auction or direct trading.
Lin said that air pollutants produced throughout the nation often exceed standards set by the administration, but that there has been no legal tool to hold plants accountable for emissions since the act was introduced in 1999.
An amendment submitted by DPP Legislator Liu Chien-kuo (劉建國) proposes a standard emission inspection system and an emission quota trading system for control zones, and that the systems be introduced after the administration consults with the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
EPA and ministry officials objected to both plans.
Department of Air Quality Protection and Noise Control Director-General Chen Hsien-heng (陳咸亨) said that since the makeup of industrial sectors and their clientele vary, and the pollution reduction technology employed by each firm varies, the proposed rules should not be imposed indiscriminately.
Environmental Protection Administration Minister Wei Kuo-yen (魏國彥) suggested that Lin’s phrasing of “shall” be changed to “may,” in accordance with the wording of the article she intends to amend, saying that it allows for more “flexible” enforcement.
He also said that Liu’s use of the word “consult” should be changed to “convene with” — a sentiment echoed by Ministry of Economic Affairs Deputy Minister Shen Jong-jin (沈榮津).
Chen and Wei’s remarks angered some legislators, who said the officials attempted to stall the introduction of overall emission control zones to protect businesses at the cost of public health, and that their proposed wording aimed at weakening accountability for pollution.
Lin criticized the EPA, saying it “subordinates itself” to the ministry, while DPP Legislator Chao Tien-lin (趙天麟), who chaired the meeting, asked Wei if the administration had “completely abandoned its principles.”
Chao broke up the meeting after announcing that the proposed amendments would be taken to the grand assembly for further discussions. None of the 10 amendments discussed yesterday were passed.
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday that China using armed force against Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, allowing the country to mobilize the Japanese armed forces under its security laws. Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session yesterday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan’s Asahi Shimbun. "If warships are used and other armed actions are involved, I believe this could constitute a survival- threatening
RSS