Taiwan’s letter of intent to become a founding member of China’s proposed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) was signed by Minister of Finance Chang Sheng-ford (張盛和), but lacked his full title as minister of finance beneath his signature.
A copy of the cover letter and the letter of intent shown at a news conference, hosted by Chang and Mainland Affairs Council Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) at 10:50pm on Tuesday, showed that neither was printed on government letterhead stationery, while the official name of the nation and the ministry were also absent.
Chang told reporters after the briefing that ministry’s emblem was originally printed on the letters, but was taken out after discussions between the council and China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) regarding the application.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
In response to questions as to why the nation’s name was not mentioned and in what capacity he wrote the letters, Chang said he signed the letter as “minister,” and not in his personal capacity.
Several Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers yesterday condemned the government for denigrating the nation’s status by omitting its name in the letters.
“Not only was the Chang’s official title not used, but the name of the Republic of China [ROC] was not included as part of the ministry’s address in the contact information. It was a complete denigration of the nation,” DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said.
Chen said that the ministry’s address was written as — 2, Aiguo W Road, Taipei, Taiwan, 10066 — meant that Taiwan was not treated as a nation, but rather as a region of China, because otherwise the postal code should have been placed before Taiwan, as is the norm.
Making a pun of buzhang (minister, 部長), DPP Legislator Huang Wei-che (黃偉哲) asked if “Chang was the buzhang of a xiaochibu [refreshment stand, 小吃部] or of a lifabu [hair salon, 理髮部].”
However, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) said the ambiguous term of “minister” was a way to address Chang that was acceptable to China and upheld the nation’s dignity.
China would have rejected the application had the letters been signed by Chang as “Minister of Finance, Republic of China,” Lai said.
“‘Minister’ suggested that he was a minister from Taiwan,” he added.
According to the council, copies of the letters were faxed to the TAO at about 7pm on Tuesday, while the Ministry of Finance faxed another set of copies to the AIIB’s Interim Secretariat at about 9pm after the council acquired its contact information from the TAO.
The Ministry of Finance transmitting the letters directly to the AIIB was in reaction to public uproar against President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) decision at a national security meeting on Monday to have the application filed through the TAO.
TAO spokesperson Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光) yesterday told a news conference in Beijing that the agency had received Taiwan’s letter of intent and welcomed its participation under the “proper name.”
However, as of press time last night, the Chinese Ministry of Finance, which updates data on AIIB membership applications on its Web site by issuing a welcome note to applicants, had not published information about Taiwan’s application.
Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying (華春瑩) on Tuesday said that Taiwan’s application to join the AIIB “should avoid the issues of “two Chinas,” or “one China, one Taiwan.”
In Taipei, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday panned the government’s decision to submit its application through the TAO, calling it degrading.
Taiwan’s entry into an international organization is a serious issue that requires a complete and professional assessment, as well as communication with the legislature and the public, she said.
“The government’s decision to apply to join the AIIB has been rather hasty, as it lacks prior assessment,” she said.
“The decisionmaking process is opaque and disrespectful to the legislature,” Tsai said.
“There is so much opposition from the public, because the government has made an international matter a cross-strait one,” she added.
Tsai said the AIIB is an international organization with its own preparatory office, making the Presidential Office’s decision to ask the council to submit the application via the TAO seriously degrading to the nation.
“The government has set a very bad example,” Tsai said.
“It is unimaginable that the KMT government would still make such a mistake after being in power for seven years,” the DPP chairperson added.
Additional reporting by Loa Iok-sin and CNA
This story has been corrected since it was first published.
DAREDEVIL: Honnold said it had always been a dream of his to climb Taipei 101, while a Netflix producer said the skyscraper was ‘a real icon of this country’ US climber Alex Honnold yesterday took on Taiwan’s tallest building, becoming the first person to scale Taipei 101 without a rope, harness or safety net. Hundreds of spectators gathered at the base of the 101-story skyscraper to watch Honnold, 40, embark on his daredevil feat, which was also broadcast live on Netflix. Dressed in a red T-shirt and yellow custom-made climbing shoes, Honnold swiftly moved up the southeast face of the glass and steel building. At one point, he stepped onto a platform midway up to wave down at fans and onlookers who were taking photos. People watching from inside
A Vietnamese migrant worker yesterday won NT$12 million (US$379,627) on a Lunar New Year scratch card in Kaohsiung as part of Taiwan Lottery Co’s (台灣彩券) “NT$12 Million Grand Fortune” (1200萬大吉利) game. The man was the first top-prize winner of the new game launched on Jan. 6 to mark the Lunar New Year. Three Vietnamese migrant workers visited a Taiwan Lottery shop on Xinyue Street in Kaohsiung’s Gangshan District (崗山), a store representative said. The player bought multiple tickets and, after winning nothing, held the final lottery ticket in one hand and rubbed the store’s statue of the Maitreya Buddha’s belly with the other,
‘COMMITTED TO DETERRENCE’: Washington would stand by its allies, but it can only help as much as countries help themselves, Raymond Greene said The US is committed to deterrence in the first island chain, but it should not bear the burden alone, as “freedom is not free,” American Institute in Taiwan Director Raymond Greene said in a speech at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research’s “Strengthening Resilience: Defense as the Engine of Development” seminar in Taipei yesterday. In the speech, titled “Investing Together and a Secure and Prosperous Future,” Greene highlighted the contributions of US President Donald Trump’s administration to Taiwan’s defense efforts, including the establishment of supply chains for drones and autonomous systems, offers of security assistance and the expansion of
Japan’s strategic alliance with the US would collapse if Tokyo were to turn away from a conflict in Taiwan, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday, but distanced herself from previous comments that suggested a possible military response in such an event. Takaichi expressed her latest views on a nationally broadcast TV program late on Monday, where an opposition party leader criticized her for igniting tensions with China with the earlier remarks. Ties between Japan and China have sunk to the worst level in years after Takaichi said in November that a hypothetical Chinese attack on Taiwan could bring about a Japanese
RSS