Taiwan’s letter of intent to become a founding member of China’s proposed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) was signed by Minister of Finance Chang Sheng-ford (張盛和), but lacked his full title as minister of finance beneath his signature.
A copy of the cover letter and the letter of intent shown at a news conference, hosted by Chang and Mainland Affairs Council Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) at 10:50pm on Tuesday, showed that neither was printed on government letterhead stationery, while the official name of the nation and the ministry were also absent.
Chang told reporters after the briefing that ministry’s emblem was originally printed on the letters, but was taken out after discussions between the council and China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) regarding the application.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
In response to questions as to why the nation’s name was not mentioned and in what capacity he wrote the letters, Chang said he signed the letter as “minister,” and not in his personal capacity.
Several Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers yesterday condemned the government for denigrating the nation’s status by omitting its name in the letters.
“Not only was the Chang’s official title not used, but the name of the Republic of China [ROC] was not included as part of the ministry’s address in the contact information. It was a complete denigration of the nation,” DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said.
Chen said that the ministry’s address was written as — 2, Aiguo W Road, Taipei, Taiwan, 10066 — meant that Taiwan was not treated as a nation, but rather as a region of China, because otherwise the postal code should have been placed before Taiwan, as is the norm.
Making a pun of buzhang (minister, 部長), DPP Legislator Huang Wei-che (黃偉哲) asked if “Chang was the buzhang of a xiaochibu [refreshment stand, 小吃部] or of a lifabu [hair salon, 理髮部].”
However, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) said the ambiguous term of “minister” was a way to address Chang that was acceptable to China and upheld the nation’s dignity.
China would have rejected the application had the letters been signed by Chang as “Minister of Finance, Republic of China,” Lai said.
“‘Minister’ suggested that he was a minister from Taiwan,” he added.
According to the council, copies of the letters were faxed to the TAO at about 7pm on Tuesday, while the Ministry of Finance faxed another set of copies to the AIIB’s Interim Secretariat at about 9pm after the council acquired its contact information from the TAO.
The Ministry of Finance transmitting the letters directly to the AIIB was in reaction to public uproar against President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) decision at a national security meeting on Monday to have the application filed through the TAO.
TAO spokesperson Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光) yesterday told a news conference in Beijing that the agency had received Taiwan’s letter of intent and welcomed its participation under the “proper name.”
However, as of press time last night, the Chinese Ministry of Finance, which updates data on AIIB membership applications on its Web site by issuing a welcome note to applicants, had not published information about Taiwan’s application.
Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying (華春瑩) on Tuesday said that Taiwan’s application to join the AIIB “should avoid the issues of “two Chinas,” or “one China, one Taiwan.”
In Taipei, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday panned the government’s decision to submit its application through the TAO, calling it degrading.
Taiwan’s entry into an international organization is a serious issue that requires a complete and professional assessment, as well as communication with the legislature and the public, she said.
“The government’s decision to apply to join the AIIB has been rather hasty, as it lacks prior assessment,” she said.
“The decisionmaking process is opaque and disrespectful to the legislature,” Tsai said.
“There is so much opposition from the public, because the government has made an international matter a cross-strait one,” she added.
Tsai said the AIIB is an international organization with its own preparatory office, making the Presidential Office’s decision to ask the council to submit the application via the TAO seriously degrading to the nation.
“The government has set a very bad example,” Tsai said.
“It is unimaginable that the KMT government would still make such a mistake after being in power for seven years,” the DPP chairperson added.
Additional reporting by Loa Iok-sin and CNA
This story has been corrected since it was first published.
MORE VISITORS: The Tourism Administration said that it is seeing positive prospects in its efforts to expand the tourism market in North America and Europe Taiwan has been ranked as the cheapest place in the world to travel to this year, based on a list recommended by NerdWallet. The San Francisco-based personal finance company said that Taiwan topped the list of 16 nations it chose for budget travelers because US tourists do not need visas and travelers can easily have a good meal for less than US$10. A bus ride in Taipei costs just under US$0.50, while subway rides start at US$0.60, the firm said, adding that public transportation in Taiwan is easy to navigate. The firm also called Taiwan a “food lover’s paradise,” citing inexpensive breakfast stalls
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s
PLUGGING HOLES: The amendments would bring the legislation in line with systems found in other countries such as Japan and the US, Legislator Chen Kuan-ting said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) has proposed amending national security legislation amid a spate of espionage cases. Potential gaps in security vetting procedures for personnel with access to sensitive information prompted him to propose the amendments, which would introduce changes to Article 14 of the Classified National Security Information Protection Act (國家機密保護法), Chen said yesterday. The proposal, which aims to enhance interagency vetting procedures and reduce the risk of classified information leaks, would establish a comprehensive security clearance system in Taiwan, he said. The amendment would require character and loyalty checks for civil servants and intelligence personnel prior to
RSS