Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) yesterday brushed off an editorial in a state-run Chinese newspaper threatening to terminate the annual Taipei-Shanghai forum.
“The Global Times does not represent anything, so why would I pay attention?” Ko said, adding that he was “clear” that the newspaper’s editorial did not reflect the stance of the Chinese government.
He expressed confidence that the forum would continue, adding that as a major world power, China should be less thin-skinned in addressing relations with Taiwan.
The Global Times, published by the Chinese Communist Party’s People’s Daily, ran an editorial on Monday condemning remarks that Ko made during an interview with the US journal Foreign Policy last week about a “two countries, one system” formula to guide cross-strait relations.
The editorial said that the Chinese government should send a signal to Taipei that there would be repercussions if Ko broke with China’s “bottom line” by refusing to acknowledge the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Ko’s predecessor had recognized the “1992 consensus” and if the new mayor were to ignore this political bottom line, it would rob the Taipei-Shanghai Forum of the “political foundation” for continuance, the editorial said, adding that Chinese support for Taipei’s hosting of the 2017 Universiade should be decided based upon on Ko’s performance.
Shanghai Mayor Yang Xiong (楊雄) has previously said that any continuation or expansion off the forum would have to be based on the “1992 consensus.”
Ko on Monday night refused to express support for the “1992 consensus,” stating instead that he was considering proposing a “2015 consensus,” to be implemented under the idea that both sides should know, understand, respect and cooperate with each other.
“Cross-strait relations should build on their existing foundation to move forward, and should not stay stuck in past labels,” Ko said. “We should continue to move forward on the existing foundation, rather than going back 23 years to hold discussions.”
There is a huge cultural gap between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, which will only lead to greater vexation if it is not closed, he said.
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Su Chi (蘇起) admitted on Feb. 21, 2006, that he had made up the term “1992 consensus” in 2000 — when he was chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council — before then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) stepped down and handed over power to his successor, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic Progressive Party.
Chang Wu-yueh (張五岳), director of Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of China Studies, said that Beijing was only testing the waters when it criticized Ko through the Global Times.
From China’s perspective, Ko’s remarks were a negative factor when considering whether the forum should continue, Chang said, adding that he did not believe Beijing would make a rash decision.
Ko only took office at the end of December last year and enjoys strong public support, so if Beijing were to get tough on him now, it would go against the will of Taiwanese, Chang said.
Holding the forum is not a pressing issue, the academic said.
However, a Shanghai-based academic said the likelihood that the forum would continue was low because China could not accept exchanges between “cities of two countries.”
Shanghai Institute of Taiwan Studies deputy director Ni Yongjie (倪永傑) said Ko’s previous remarks that he did not know about the “1992 consensus” were dishonest.
Ni said that he thinks Ko sees the concept as “two countries,” similar to the idea of special “state-to-state” relations formulated by Lee and backed by Chen.
Ko’s statement on “two countries, one system” would have a negative impact on cross-strait relations and the Democratic Progressive Party, Ni said.
The first Taipei-Shanghai forum was held in 2010.
Additional reporting by staff writer
AGING: As of last month, people aged 65 or older accounted for 20.06 percent of the total population and the number of couples who got married fell by 18,685 from 2024 Taiwan has surpassed South Korea as the country least willing to have children, with an annual crude birthrate of 4.62 per 1,000 people, Ministry of the Interior data showed yesterday. The nation was previously ranked the second-lowest country in terms of total fertility rate, or the average number of children a woman has in her lifetime. However, South Korea’s fertility rate began to recover from 2023, with total fertility rate rising from 0.72 and estimated to reach 0.82 to 0.85 by last year, and the crude birthrate projected at 6.7 per 1,000 people. Japan’s crude birthrate was projected to fall below six,
Conflict with Taiwan could leave China with “massive economic disruption, catastrophic military losses, significant social unrest, and devastating sanctions,” a US think tank said in a report released on Monday. The German Marshall Fund released a report titled If China Attacks Taiwan: The Consequences for China of “Minor Conflict” and “Major War” Scenarios. The report details the “massive” economic, military, social and international costs to China in the event of a minor conflict or major war with Taiwan, estimating that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could sustain losses of more than half of its active-duty ground forces, including 100,000 troops. Understanding Chinese
SELF-DEFENSE: Tokyo has accelerated its spending goal and its defense minister said the nation needs to discuss whether it should develop nuclear-powered submarines China is ramping up objections to what it sees as Japan’s desire to acquire nuclear weapons, despite Tokyo’s longstanding renunciation of such arms, deepening another fissure in the two neighbors’ increasingly tense ties. In what appears to be a concerted effort, China’s foreign and defense ministries issued statements on Thursday condemning alleged remilitarism efforts by Tokyo. The remarks came as two of the country’s top think tanks jointly issued a 29-page report framing actions by “right-wing forces” in Japan as posing a “serious threat” to world peace. While that report did not define “right-wing forces,” the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs was
US President Donald Trump in an interview with the New York Times published on Thursday said that “it’s up to” Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) what China does on Taiwan, but that he would be “very unhappy” with a change in the “status quo.” “He [Xi] considers it to be a part of China, and that’s up to him what he’s going to be doing, but I’ve expressed to him that I would be very unhappy if he did that, and I don’t think he’ll do that. I hope he doesn’t do that,” Trump said. Trump made the comments in the context