A new study by the Project 2049 Institute — a Washington-based security and public policy think tank — quotes unnamed sources as saying that Taiwan’s spying operations against China “are the most effective in the world.”
Research fellow Ian Easton says in a footnote to the study that he learned this from “multiple interviews” in the Washington area and in Tokyo over the past year.
Providing advanced warning of Chinese preparations for an attack or providing warning that an attack might be under way are the highest priority for Taiwanese intelligence services, he says.
“Indications and warning (I&W) is essential during peacetime to prevent the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from obtaining the advantage of surprise,” Easton said in the study titled Able Archers — Taiwan Defense Strategy in the Age of Precision Strike.
“Taiwan’s timely and reliable I&W greatly contributes to good decisionmaking, allowing leaders to take appropriate steps ranging from increasing the readiness levels of forces to activating contingency plans,” Easton wrote.
Information about Chinese activities obtained from Taiwan’s early-warning radar systems is combined with data collected by other sources as a basis for action by Taiwanese and US decisionmakers, the study found.
In a rare glimpse into Taiwan’s intelligence gathering system, the study found that the nation operates a significant signals intelligence (SIGINT) system capable of gathering data on the “intentions, activities and capabilities” of China’s military and security forces.
“Taiwan exploits a large number of listening posts, its close proximity to China and its world-class information and communications technology expertise for collecting SIGINT,” it added.
The study says that the nation might have been the first in the world to establish a cyberwarfare command.
“Taiwan’s ability to penetrate PLA [People’s Liberation Army] systems benefits from its well-regarded computer hacking and computer security communities — as well as its commanding position on the supply chains that support the PRC’s electronics and computer technology industries,” the study says.
According to Easton, “anecdotal evidence” suggests that Taiwan’s computer hardware and software engineering talent continues to outpace competition in China.
He wrote that the nation’s government has a long history of leveraging its close cultural, linguistic and economic ties to China for collecting traditional human intelligence.
“Western media reports generally focus on the Chinese intelligence threat to Taiwan, while overlooking Taipei’s impressive track record of penetrating high-level targets in Beijing,” Easton wrote.
Counterintelligence experts and retired government officials have said that, despite the massive collection efforts aimed at it, Taiwan has been more successful at protecting classified information than South Korea and Japan.
Easton wrote that examples of intelligence successes include Taiwan’s collection of detailed information on China’s intercontinental ballistic missiles, the PLA’s Second Artillery Corps nuclear weapons division and Beijing’s construction of drones and airbases.
In addition, Easton wrote that Taiwan’s special operations forces might be sent to the US for SEAL, Delta Force, Green Beret, Ranger and Airborne training.
“During a full-scale conflict, Taiwan’s military would likely use its special operations forces to strike a limited number of high-value targets in China that it deems are essential to PLA operations,” he wrote.
These targets could include airfields, command posts, missile launchers and port facilities.
“It is thought that Taiwan special operations forces units have already prepared the battlefield through the use of covert reconnaissance operations and the exploitation of agents that Taiwan may have in Fujian Province and elsewhere inside the PRC,” the study says.
The study concludes that the constant pressure that Beijing puts on the White House, the US Department of State and the Pentagon “inevitably threatens to make any US decision regarding Taiwan difficult and politicized.”
In an effort to improve Taiwan’s security, the study calls on the administration of US President Barack Obama to relax its limits on visits to Taiwan by senior US military officers.
The study urges the White House to promote bilateral defense industry cooperation with Taiwan, leading to joint technology programs similar to those in place with Japan.
And it wants to see the Obama administration fully incorporate Taiwan into its rebalance to Asia.
“As in any relationship, trust is critical, especially when life and death and the fate of nations are at stake,” Easton wrote.
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST: Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu said the strengthening of military facilities would help to maintain security in the Taiwan Strait Japanese Minister of Defense Shinjiro Koizumi, visiting a military base close to Taiwan, said plans to deploy missiles to the post would move forward as tensions smolder between Tokyo and Beijing. “The deployment can help lower the chance of an armed attack on our country,” Koizumi told reporters on Sunday as he wrapped up his first trip to the base on the southern Japanese island of Yonaguni. “The view that it will heighten regional tensions is not accurate.” Former Japanese minister of defense Gen Nakatani in January said that Tokyo wanted to base Type 03 Chu-SAM missiles on Yonaguni, but little progress
INTERCEPTION: The 30km test ceiling shows that the CSIST is capable of producing missiles that could stop inbound missiles as they re-enter the atmosphere Recent missile tests by the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology (CSIST) show that Taiwan’s missiles are capable of intercepting ballistic missiles as they re-enter the atmosphere and pose a significant deterrent to Chinese missile threats, former Hsiung Feng III missile development project chief engineer Chang Cheng (張誠) said yesterday. The military-affiliated institute has been conducting missile tests, believed to be related to Project Chiang Kung (強弓) at Pingtung County’s Jiupeng Military Base, with many tests deviating from past practices of setting restriction zones at “unlimited” and instead clearly stating a 30.48km range, Chang said. “Unlimited” restrictions zones for missile tests is
RSS