Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chang Ching-chung (張慶忠) yesterday triggered fresh controversy by passing a KMT proposal at a legislative committee meeting he was chairing to probe the signing of the cross-strait service trade agreement and abruptly calling the session to an end while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) was still speaking at the podium.
Amid the ongoing disputes over the trade pact and the government’s handling of it, a commission was created under the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee to investigate the criticisms and concerns voiced about the cross-strait negotiations that led to the deal’s signing.
Since the majority of government agencies have yet to submit the documents for the probe requested by the commission, the committee last week decided to extend the submission deadline from May 31 to Aug. 31, when it will be DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai’s (陳其邁) turn to serve as committee chair.
Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times
However, KMT legislators on the committee yesterday tabled a proposal to change the deadline back to its original date, triggering protests from their DPP counterparts, who took turns speaking at the podium to explain why they are opposed to moving the deadline back.
As Tuan was speaking, Chang suddenly asked the committee to vote on the KMT motion and quickly declared that it had passed, so the deadline was restored to May 31.
“Do you know the price you have to pay to run a tank through the committee meeting?” Tuan said in reaction to Chang’s move.
“This is too much, how could you hold a vote and declare a motion passed while a legislator is still talking on the podium?” DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) said.
Ignoring the protests, Chang called the meeting to an end and promptly left the room.
“Chang has planted a bomb in the Internal Administration Committee,” Tuan said. “We will see what happens on Wednesday [during the next meeting].”
After the meeting, DPP lawmakers condemned what they called the KMT’s “rude” behavior at a press conference.
“It’s clear that by changing the document request deadline from Aug. 31 — the date agreed upon at last week’s committee meeting — to May 31, the KMT is trying to prevent the public from knowing the truth behind the [cross-strait service trade pact] negotiations,” Chen said.
If the deadline is at the end of the month, there will not be enough time to request and collect the required documents, he added.
Chen said he would convene another committee meeting next week to again extend the document request deadline.
There is only one reason the KMT wants to move the deadline forward: To pass the supervision statute and the service trade pact in the current legislative session or an in extra session, if there is one, Lee added.
“I’d like to remind KMT legislators that the ‘black-box procedure’ [critics’ term for the bilateral trade negotiations] is what triggered the Sunflower movement. They should not have produced another black box,” Lee said.
Additional reporting by Chris Wang
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s