President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has mishandled cross-strait relations and the government should respect Taiwan’s sovereignty, safeguard the interests of its people and uphold the democratic process, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said yesterday.
While the DPP has always supported fair and reciprocal cross-strait economic activities, the public, the opposition and most Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians were not informed of the contents of a service trade agreement set to be signed today, DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) said.
“It is unbelievable that in a democratic country, only a handful of high-ranking government officials know what the agreement entails. It was also unbelievable that the sectors to be included on the liberalization list and what impact the agreement could have on those sectors, their employees and Taiwan’s economy remain unknown,” Su said.
PHOTO: Sam Yeh, AFP
He said the pact should not be signed before the government submits an impact assessment report.
Su also criticized the KMT for advocating a “one China” structure to echo Beijing’s “one China” framework without going through a democratic process, saying that the initiative has stripped the Taiwanese of their right to determine their own future.
“We demand that Ma explain the matter to the public clearly, without ambiguity or evasion,” Su said.
DPP spokesperson Lin Chun-hsien (林俊憲) said the party condemns the opaque nature of the service trade agreement.
“Taiwanese businesses and workers are entitled to be informed of the details of the pact, which is a follow-up to the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement [ECFA], and may affect their livelihoods. The negotiations should also be monitored by the legislature,” Lin said.
Citing a recent public opinion poll conducted by the DPP’s polling center, Lin said 68.4 percent of respondents said the Ma administration has failed to meet its stated goals three years after the ECFA was signed and only 9.9 percent thought that the goals have been met.
The poll, conducted on June 10 and June 11, collected 989 valid samples and had a margin of error of 3.18 percentage points.
DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) said China has refused to liberalize the sector related to intellectual property rights, which is Taiwan’s most competitive service sector, while for the other four sectors — transportation, travel, insurance and finance — in which Taiwan enjoys advantages that are scheduled to be liberalized, Beijing has set up trade barriers.
“Beijing only wanted to absorb Taiwan’s labor, investments and know-how in those sectors,” Lee said.
Meanwhile, Taiwan Solidarity Union Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) said the agreement scheduled to be signed today is a ploy by the Ma administration to legalize the entry of Chinese workers to Taiwan.
The new pact would affect more than 4.7 million employees in Taiwan, he said.
The ECFA did not substantially benefit Taiwan, as the administration claims, and the government’s eagerness to open the service sector to Chinese investors ignores the common worker in Taiwan and panders to the Chinese, Huang said.
“Opening the market to foreign investment is an opportunity to increase job opportunities, but opening up the service trade will only take away jobs from Taiwanese and harm Taiwanese businesses,” Huang said.
Voicing doubts about the quality of the Chinese service sector, Huang said Taiwan’s service quality outranked China’s by a fair margin.
“It doesn’t matter which area of the service sector — hair salons and cosmetics, tourism or dining — once it is opened to cheap Chinese labor it will take away job opportunities from Taiwanese,” Huang said, adding that the opening would fuel a vicious cycle of cost-cutting.
Additional reporting by Chen Ching-min and Tseng Wei-chen
CONSOLIDATION? Taiwan Thinktank deputy executive-general Doong Sy-chi said Beijing’s intimidation tactics are further alienating those who identify as Chinese Only 2 percent of respondents to a poll on constitutional amendments and national identity identified as Chinese, while 62.6 percent identified as Taiwanese, the Taiwan Thinktank said yesterday. Legislators have proposed amendments to the Additional Articles of the Constitution (憲法增修條文), which would change the definition of the nation’s territory, remove the Taiwan Provincial Government as an entity, prioritize the use of “Taiwan” for national groups at international events, and remove restrictions on defining the national emblem, national flag and national anthem. The poll showed that 80.5 percent of respondents agreed that the nation should participate as “Taiwan” at events organized by world
NO SIGN OF WAR: Only if Taiwanese showed determination to defend the nation would others be willing to help in the event of a Chinese attack, the premier said Should China launch a war against Taiwan, the military would fight to the last standing person, Minister of National Defense Yen De-fa (嚴德發) said yesterday, adding that the nation has fully fleshed-out defense strategies. “Beijing has continued its acts of provocation against Taiwan, but there are currently no signs that it is ready to launch a full-scale war,” Yen said at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. Asked how long Taiwan could withstand an attack from China, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) said: “Taiwan will not fall.” Any belligerent force that initiates acts of war would pay a heavy price, and so too would Beijing,
MISTAKE: The Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy is not a UN body, and the government is committed to protecting the nation’s name, Joseph Wu said The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday condemned the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy for listing Taiwanese cities as belonging to China on its Web site, and asked that it correct the error. The organization was inaugurated in Brussels in 2016 as a global coalition of mayors committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Six Taiwanese cities at the time joined the coalition as cities in “Taiwan,” the ministry said. However, officials from the Kaohsiung City Government — one of the organization’s members — last week noticed that the city was now listed on the organization’s Web site as a
MOTHERLAND? Taiwanese who take part in China’s National Day celebrations could be fined NT$100,000 to NT$500,000 if found to have contravened Taiwanese laws The Ministry of Culture yesterday cautioned China-based Taiwanese artists against breaching Taiwanese law by taking part in China’s National Day celebrations. The ministry issued the statement following media reports that Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) is to sing a popular Chinese patriotic song titled My Motherland (我的祖國), and Angela Chang (張韶涵) is to sing Protect (守護) with Chinese entertainers at an event to mark China’s National Day on Thursday. The Mainland Affairs Council is investigating whether such behavior contravenes regulations in the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), the ministry said. If the behavior involves matters