A draft act to allow Taiwan and China to establish representative offices in each other’s countries failed to pass its initial legislative committee review yesterday as opposition parties paralyzed the Internal Administration Committee meeting, while Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers also voiced dissatisfaction with the negotiations.
The establishment of representative offices in Taiwan and China will be addressed in the ninth round of cross-strait talks between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) today in Shanghai. The foundation and ARATS will also sign a cross-strait service trade agreement during the negotiations.
The Internal Administration Committee was at 9am to begin review of legislation to allow Taiwan and China to create representative offices in each other’s countries. However, lawmakers from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Taiwan Solidarity Union and People First Party (PFP) arrived outside the meeting room at 7am, long before most KMT legislators arrived, at about 8:30am.
As soon as the room’s door was opened, opposition lawmakers rushed to occupy the podium to prevent the meeting from starting, and they succeeded in stalling the proceedings all day.
“A few days after a meeting between KMT Chairman Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) during which Wu and Xi agreed on the ‘one China’ principle and creating representative offices, the government is pushing through legislation for it,” DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said of the reason behind the caucus’ boycott. “However, the Mainland Affairs Council has yet to brief us on the ongoing talks about creating representative offices, so passing the legislation now would be like giving it a blank check.”
DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) also accused President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration of “asking the Legislative Yuan for a blank check” for the establishment of cross-strait representative offices before bilateral negotiations are completed.
It is essential for Taipei to have visitation rights to Taiwanese detained in China and the authorization to issue travel documents, but the administration demanded that the legislation be passed without the legislature knowing Beijing’s position on the matter, which was why the DPP would not accept the request before the negotiations are completed, Su said.
Meanwhile, the PFP issued a statement saying that while it supports enhancing cross-strait ties, “we do not agree with President Ma Ying-jeou’s handling of cross-strait talks, which has made cross-strait exchanges a business of his own and of his party.”
KMT caucus whip Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) condemned the boycott as “unreasonable” and “irrational,” but added at a separate setting that the KMT caucus was also dissatisfied that the council is unable to convince China to grant Taipei visitation rights to Taiwanese detained or jailed in China.
“There are at least 1,000 Taiwanese being detained or imprisoned in China. I think it’s entirely reasonable to ask China to allow officials from Taiwan’s representative office in China to visit them,” KMT Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) told a press conference at the KMT caucus office in the presence of Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦).
“Without the right to humanitarian visits being included in the agreement, the KMT caucus will not support the draft bill either,” he said.