The US Department of State has expressed concern about the WHO’s apparent lack of transparency in deciding Taiwan’s designation in the world health body.
The department said in a recent report to the US Congress that the Geneva-based organization did not hold discussions with member countries before deciding to refer to Taiwan as a “province of China” in its internal documents.
The report was referring to a letter from Anne Marie Worning, executive director of the office of WHO Director-General Margaret Chan (陳馮富珍), sent in September last year, that asked its recipients to refer to Taiwan as “Taiwan, province of China” instead of “Chinese Taipei.”
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
Taiwan was admitted to the World Health Assembly (WHA) — the WHO’s decisionmaking arm — as an observer in 2009 under the name “Chinese Taipei” and has lodged a strongly worded letter of protest to the WHO over the issue of the unilateral change in nomenclature.
The State Department said it has pushed the WHO Secretariat to follow the WHA model in resolving the Taiwan name dispute. The use of “Chinese Taipei” as the designation for Taiwan follows a model adopted by the WTO, in which Taiwan uses a title that is acceptable to both sides of the Taiwan Strait, the report said.
The report also voiced concern about the WHO’s many restrictions on Taiwan’s efforts to take part in various WHO-sponsored technical activities and consultations.
Citing data provided by Taiwanese authorities, the report said Taipei applied to take part in 21 WHO working panels and technical activities last year, of which eight were approved, nine were rejected and four received no response.
Although Taiwan has offered on many occasions to contribute to WHO-organized health promotion programs around the world, it has often been denied access to those projects, the report said. For instance, Taiwan offered to provide US$5 million for a vaccination program during an outbreak of a new strain of H1N1 influenza, but the WHO turned down the offer because it would not accept Taiwan’s payment terms.
Saying that Taiwan has received a great deal of unfair or unequal treatment from the WHO in recent years, the report added that the only progress has been the WHO’s consent to Taiwan’s attendance as an observer at the annual WHA from 2009 to last year.
The report said US Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius met with her Taiwanese counterpart, Department of Health Minister Chiu Wen-ta (邱文達), on the sidelines of last year’s WHA, during which they discussed a broad range of health-related topics and explored feasible cooperative initiatives under the current framework.
Under its “one China” policy, the report said, the US does not support Taiwan’s admission to international organizations that require statehood as a requirement for membership, including the UN and its special agencies like the WHO.
However, the report stressed that the US fully supports Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the WHA and other international organizations that do not require statehood.
It added that Taiwan’s participation in the WHA as an observer should be normalized by allowing it to take part in more activities, including joining the International Food Safety Authorities Network.
According to a paper provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday, the State Department said in the report that “the unresolved issue of nomenclature has severely hampered efforts to involve Taiwan further in the effective implementation of IHRs [International Health Regulations].”
“For instance, in the way Taiwan ports are listed under the heading of China and in delayed communications with experts from Taiwan due to some communications being routed through Beijing or China’s mission in Geneva,” the report said.
Deputy foreign ministry spokesperson Steve Shia (夏季昌) said the government finds it “unacceptable” that the WHO consults with any other party about Taiwan before contacting Taiwan.
However, Shia reiterated the government’s contention that Taiwan and the WHO have been communicating with each other “directly” over IHR-related matters.
“We have been able to access to the WHO directly. We have never contacted the WHO through Beijing or the Chinese mission in Geneva as the US report said,” Shia said.
It’s “probably true” that the WHO talks to China before it contacts Taiwan, which was what the US was opposed to, Shia said, adding: “We do not accept that either.”
Shia said Taiwan would continue to lodge protests with the WHO.
The ministry also thanked the US government for its support of Taiwan’s participation in the WHA as an observer, Shia said.
The Department of Health received an invitation from Chan on April 5 to attend this year’s WHA as an observer.
DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Taiwan shares the same values as those that fought in WWII, and nations must unite to halt the expansion of a new authoritarian bloc, Lai said The government yesterday held a commemoration ceremony for Victory in Europe (V-E) Day, joining the rest of the world for the first time to mark the anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe. Taiwan honoring V-E Day signifies “our growing connections with the international community,” President William Lai (賴清德) said at a reception in Taipei on the 80th anniversary of V-E Day. One of the major lessons of World War II is that “authoritarianism and aggression lead only to slaughter, tragedy and greater inequality,” Lai said. Even more importantly, the war also taught people that “those who cherish peace cannot
STEADFAST FRIEND: The bills encourage increased Taiwan-US engagement and address China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758 to isolate Taiwan internationally The Presidential Office yesterday thanked the US House of Representatives for unanimously passing two Taiwan-related bills highlighting its solid support for Taiwan’s democracy and global participation, and for deepening bilateral relations. One of the bills, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, requires the US Department of State to periodically review its guidelines for engagement with Taiwan, and report to the US Congress on the guidelines and plans to lift self-imposed limitations on US-Taiwan engagement. The other bill is the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan or its people in
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo on Friday expressed concern over the rate at which China is diversifying its military exercises, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Saturday. “The rates of change on the depth and breadth of their exercises is the one non-linear effect that I’ve seen in the last year that wakes me up at night or keeps me up at night,” Paparo was quoted by FT as saying while attending the annual Sedona Forum at the McCain Institute in Arizona. Paparo also expressed concern over the speed with which China was expanding its military. While the US
‘FALLACY’: Xi’s assertions that Taiwan was given to the PRC after WWII confused right and wrong, and were contrary to the facts, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday called Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) claim that China historically has sovereignty over Taiwan “deceptive” and “contrary to the facts.” In an article published on Wednesday in the Russian state-run Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Xi said that this year not only marks 80 years since the end of World War II and the founding of the UN, but also “Taiwan’s restoration to China.” “A series of instruments with legal effect under international law, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration have affirmed China’s sovereignty over Taiwan,” Xi wrote. “The historical and legal fact” of these documents, as well