Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers yesterday criticized a government-sponsored study of the 228 Massacre in 1947 that blamed the Presbyterian Church for the riot, whitewashing the responsibility of Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) regime.
The study conducted by Chu Hung-yuan (朱浤源), a research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Modern History, received a grant of NT$500,000 from the government-affiliated Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, part of the organization’s regular sponsorships of academic studies.
In its defense, Taiwan Foundation for Democracy chief executive Huang Teh-fu (黃德福) said Chu’s study represented his personal views and that it was not the position of the organization because it was a grant-maintained study rather than a project undertaken by the organization.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
Chu published his research in November last year in Washington and said he had made five breakthroughs.
The first was the use of personal testimony by Hsu Hsueh-chi (許雪姬) and other researchers, which the Research Report on the 228 Incident published by the Executive Yuan in 1992 was based on, was likely to include “unnecessary emotion.” The second was the key role of the underground Chinese Communist Party. The third was the intervention of “hawkish” figures from the US. The fourth was the exceptionally small number of military personnel stationed in Taiwan at the time and the fifth was the Presbyterian Church’s “wide participation in the attacks.”
Huang was bombarded with questions from DPP lawmakers regarding the study at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee.
“How could you not know what role the Presbyterian Church played in the democratization process in the country? Chu admitted that he wasn’t able to access the Presbyterian Church’s files. Given that, how could he come to the conclusion he did?” DPP Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) asked.
Huang said the conclusion was also “to our regret,” adding that the foundation would upload the research online so that it could be subject to scrutiny.
DPP Legislator Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) said Chu’s research distorted the facts of the incident and that it could cause serious damage to families of the victims of the incident, creating confrontation between Taiwanese and Mainlanders.
“The research is unacceptable. It attributed the uprising to incitement initiated by the Presbyterian Church and local ruffians and to infiltration by the Chinese Communist Party. Even former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was an instigator. How can we accept such baseless conclusions?” Tsai asked.
Citing an example of the so-called “new findings” in Chu’s research, Tsai noted an incident whereby a group led by the Presbyterian Church attacked Mainlanders in Changhua County and robbed their textile factory.
“Is this true? Did people see the Presbyterian Church lead the killers? Why haven’t we seen similar descriptions in previous research?” he asked.
Chu has a history of causing controversy when commenting on the 228 Incident.
In 2007, he said the Japanese colonial government was to blame for the violence, rather than Chiang, because the Japanese deliberately created inflation before they handed Taiwan over to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to provoke public resentment of Chiang’s regime.
The 228 Incident was a Japanese “premeditated economic attack” on Taiwan, Chu said, adding that the US was complicit in the 228 Incident because it had planned to bring Taiwan under its mandate.
CARROT AND STICK: While unrelenting in its military threats, China attracted nearly 40,000 Taiwanese to over 400 business events last year Nearly 40,000 Taiwanese last year joined industry events in China, such as conferences and trade fairs, supported by the Chinese government, a study showed yesterday, as Beijing ramps up a charm offensive toward Taipei alongside military pressure. China has long taken a carrot-and-stick approach to Taiwan, threatening it with the prospect of military action while reaching out to those it believes are amenable to Beijing’s point of view. Taiwanese security officials are wary of what they see as Beijing’s influence campaigns to sway public opinion after Taipei and Beijing gradually resumed travel links halted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the scale of
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
Pope Francis is be laid to rest on Saturday after lying in state for three days in St Peter’s Basilica, where the faithful are expected to flock to pay their respects to history’s first Latin American pontiff. The cardinals met yesterday in the Vatican’s synod hall to chart the next steps before a conclave begins to choose Francis’ successor, as condolences poured in from around the world. According to current norms, the conclave must begin between May 5 and 10. The cardinals set the funeral for Saturday at 10am in St Peter’s Square, to be celebrated by the dean of the College
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s
RSS