Soon after assuming office in 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) established a “military confidence-building mechanism” (CBM) task force at the suggestion of then-National Security Council (NSC) secretary-general Su Chi (蘇起), a body that continues to function to this day, a source said.
From its inception, the task force was reportedly headed by Lieutenant General Lee Hsiang-chou (李翔宙), then-deputy dean of National Defense University (NDU), with Major General Tsao Hsiung-yuan (曹雄源), then the head of the school’s Graduate Institute of Strategic Studies, acting as deputy, said the source, who is affiliated with the Ministry of National Defense.
The task force was reportedly charged with evaluating and fleshing out a framework for Taiwan to establish military CBMs with China.
The Chinese-language United Evening News reported in August that Lee Hsiang-chou was highly trusted by the ministry and had been assigned to conduct research on certain “highly sensitive” national security issues, including a CBM with China.
The reports said Minister of National Defense Kao Hua-chu (高華柱) had specifically requested that Lee Hsiang-chou, who represented the ministry in communications with the NSC, apprise himself of developments on the CBM issue.
The source claimed the ministry had been kept at arm’s length regarding the activities of the task force, which he added was operating in a manner that lacked transparency.
The administrations of former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) both actively sought to develop CBMs with China. Those efforts, which involved task forces, conferences and studies, began in the late 1990s.
However, some fear that under Ma, a CBM with China could be signed under a “one China” framework rather than as an international or state-to-state agreement, which would have implications for Taiwan’s sovereignty.
China’s 2010 Defense White Paper states that it regards any future CBM with Taiwan as a domestic matter, thus differentiating its scope and legal framework from similar deals with other states in the region.
Writing in Defense Security Brief in July, Alexander Huang (黃介正), professor at the Graduate Institute of International Affairs at Tamkang University, said: “China’s concept of building cross-strait ‘military trust’ is not a series of engagements between the two militaries, aiming at conflict prevention. Rather, it is a combination of political and security engineering process [sic] to reunify China under Beijing’s terms.”
So far, the Ma administration maintains that the time is not ripe to strike a CBM deal with China, given the complexity of the political situation.
The task force is not believed to have made official contact with any counterpart on the Chinese side.
Coincidentally, Lee Hsiang-chou and Tsao’s careers in the military have seen considerable success since the creation of the alleged task force.
Lee, whom a US-based academic described as a “very sharp, capable and professional officer,” started his career as director of former president Lee’s bodyguard unit and had once been seen as “pan-green” in his political inclinations.
However, since the task force was established, Lee Hsiang-chou gained the attention of both Su and Ma and was subsequently transferred to the position of Military Police commander in June 2009, though his rank was unchanged, the source said.
In May, Lee Hsiang-chou was promoted to Deputy Chief of the General Staff and made a general and Commander in Chief of the Army.
Tsao, despite being brought up on charges during his tenure as head of the Graduate Institute of Strategic Studies for violating academic ethics and given two demerits for the incident, was still promoted to a position in the NDU’s Management College in July this year.
The task force allegedly remains in operation to this day and has retained its original organizational structure, the source said.
Contacted for comment, Su denied such a task force existed and said he did not know Tsao. Speaking on behalf of the council, a Presidential Office spokesman also denied the claim.
“It is the council’s responsibility to collect information and conduct assessment on issues related to national security,” the spokesperson said. “However, no task force on a mutual trust mechanism for cross-strait military affairs was set up under the council.”
Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添), who sometimes participates at security council meetings, also said he had not heard of the task force.
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Chairman Kao Charng (高長), Government Information Office Minister Philip Yang (楊永明) and National Chengchi University professor Chen Teh-sheng (陳德昇), who were security council members early in the Ma administration, all said they had no knowledge of the task force. Deputy Minister of National Defense Andrew Yang (楊念祖) also denied any knowledge of the group.
Ministry spokesman David Lo (羅紹和) declined to comment on whether the task force existed.
Lo said that establishing a CBM with China was a matter of core national security and was therefore at the national level, adding that the military would follow government policy.
On establishing a CBM with China or other military issues, the ministry does not have plans to exchange or negotiate with its counterparts in China, he said.
As for a peace accord with China, which Ma proposed could be signed in 10 years if the conditions are ripe, Lo said this was a political issue in which the ministry has no say.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiu-chuan,Mo Yan-chih and Rich Chang
CAUTION: Taiwanese should be alert, even if they have just liked or shared posts that would breach Beijing’s national security legislation for Hong Kong, the council said Due to the newly implemented Hong Kong national security legislation, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has drawn up a list of what it described as “high-risk groups,” cautioning them not to travel to Hong Kong. People who support independence for Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet and Xinjiang; those who are critical of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the Hong Kong government and the “one country, two systems” concept; and those who donated to or voiced support for the Hong Kong anti-extradition bill movement are urged to refrain from visiting Hong Kong, the council said on its Web site. It released two posts on
HONG KONG SECURITY: The president blasted regulations requiring Taiwanese agents or political organizations to provide information on their Hong Kong-related activities President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday warned of countermeasures should controversial Chinese national security legislation imposed on Hong Kong undermine or harm Taiwanese interests. Article 43 of the legislation empowers the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to serve written notices to Taiwanese political organizations or individual agents to furnish information on their Hong Kong-related activities, including their personal particulars, finances, assets, expenditure and capital in the territory. Failure to comply or providing false or incomplete information can result in a fine of HK$100,000 (US$12,903) or imprisonment of six months or two years respectively. Tsai said that Taiwan would keep a close watch on how
NEW HONG KONG LAW: A visit to Beijing-friendly nations or those with weak judicial systems could leave people at risk of deportation to China, a former MAC official said Beijing could request countries with which it has extradition agreements to deport Taiwanese to China to face criminal charges following the implementation of national security legislation for Hong Kong, a former Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) official warned yesterday. Some developing countries, and those close to China because of the Belt and Road Initiative, are likely to accommodate Beijing’s requests to extradite Taiwanese to China, said former deputy MAC minister Chen Ming-chi (陳明祺), who served from July 2, 2018, until May 20, and then returned to his former post as an assistant professor of sociology at National Tsing Hua University. While Taiwanese
MORAL COURAGE: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs urged the global community to face China’s intention to subdue Taiwan and reject such irrational requests The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday strongly condemned the Chinese government for meddling with US officials’ interactions with Taiwan after FBI Director Christopher Wray revealed China’s efforts to discourage US officials from visiting Taiwan. The greatest long-term threat to the US’ information security and intellectual property, as well as its economic vitality, is China’s counterintelligence and economic espionage operations, Wray told a video event at the Hudson Institute in Washington. Beijing is engaged in a highly sophisticated and maligning foreign influence campaign, with methods that include bribery, blackmail and covert deals, he said. Giving an example, Wray said that when a US official