As of today, commercial sex work within red-light districts designated by local governments is legal in Taiwan, as lawmakers yesterday voted to support the motion proposed the Executive Yuan.
With the Sunday deadline approaching — set by the Council of Grand Justices two years ago to address the unconstitutionality of Article 80 of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法) that penalizes only prostitutes and not their clients — lawmakers voted for the amendment presented by the government and supported by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus.
On Nov. 6, 2009, the Council of Grand Justices in Constitutional Interpretation No. 666 found Article 80 in violation of the spirit of equality embodied in the Constitution and ruled that the article be invalidated within two years.
According to the amendment, people who engage in the sex trade outside red-light districts, both sex workers and customers, as well as those who sell or buy sex in public, face a fine of NT$30,000.
The amendment also allows procurers and brothel owners to operate in red-light districts, while they could be fined between NT$10,000 and NT$50,000 respectively, and be held in detention for three to five days, if they work outside the designated areas.
In opposition to the proposal, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Huang Sue-ying (黃淑英) put forward an amendment seeking to follow the Swedish model, which criminalizes customers, but not sex workers.
Her proposal was voted down 40 to two, with the two “yes” votes cast by herself and DPP Legislator Chai Trong-rong (蔡同榮).
The 32-member DPP caucus supported Huang in putting forward the amendment, but did not require its members to show up and vote against the 72-seat KMT caucus, which cast 41 ballots yesterday.
After the vote, Huang expressed “regrets” that the government and the KMT followed the “Dutch model, which has proved a big failure,” while rejecting the Swedish model that has seen the sex industry decline.
The passage of the amendment “provided legal protection for men to fulfill their sexual needs by giving them the right to go whoring” and “throws women back [to rely on] on their own resources [for protection],” Huang said.
It would also exacerbate the problem of human trafficking, Huang added.
Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), in charge of drafting the government-proposed amendment, opposed Huang’s proposal on the grounds that the Swedish model, in which clients are prosecuted and sex workers are not, could render the amended article unconstitutional.
Huang said that Jiang was wrong about the meaning of the equality principle in the Constitution.
“Equality means equality in essence and not equality in form. Women are at a more disadvantaged position than men, who are not prosecuted. Men have to pay for the social costs they cause,” she said.
She said the KMT government failed to see and pursue the values embodied in the Swedish model. According to this model, “women should not be viewed as sexual objects or have a price tag put on them.”
“Legalizing the sex trade would worsen human trafficking and discrimination against women, and the sex industry should not be regarded as a means to boost industry,” she added.
KMT Legislator Pan Wei-kang (潘維剛) said legalizing the sex trade in red-light districts “did not compromise our goal to gradually eliminate the sex industry.”
With a resolution attached to the act that required the government to actively provide sex workers with conversion training courses, the government would help sex workers to develop skills to earn their living without having to rely on sex work to survive, Pan said.
The new law comes into effect today, after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) later yesterday promulgated the amendment to the act.
Jiang, meanwhile, urged local governments to “face the issue” and promised that the ministry would hold further talks with local governments on creating red-light districts.
However, civic groups both supporting and opposing the sex industry criticized the amendments to the Social Order Maintenance Act.
“The only purposes of the revision is to protect men’s right to hire prostitutes and to ensure that whoever wants to could have healthy women to buy,” Taiwan Women’s Link secretary-general Tsai Wan-fen (蔡宛芬) said yesterday. “We regret that women’s rights have gone back to where they were 30 years ago.”
The secretary-general of End Child Prostitution, Child Pornography and Trafficking of Children for Sexual Purposes Taiwan, Lee Li-fen (李麗芬), said that allowing the sex industry even within a specially designated area could be in violation of Article 6 of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women, which states: “Parties shall take all appropriate measures, including legislation, to suppress all forms of traffic in women and exploitation of prostitution of women.”
Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters secretary-general Chung Chun-chu (鍾君竺) also criticized the red-light district amendment as empty and regressive.
“The law says that local governments ‘could’ create special districts,” she told a rally outside the Legislative Yuan. “You [the government] tell us that both the sex worker and the client would not be penalized within the district, but where is it? So far, none of the local governments have any plans to create red-light districts.”
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s