In a stunning turn of events in a 23-month-long court battle, a judge has decided to suspend the hearing and ask for a constitutional interpretation on whether illegal restrictions have been placed on the public’s right to assembly and on freedom of speech.
Taipei District Court Judge Chen Ssu-fan (陳思帆), presiding over a case where a university professor was arrested for holding a sit-in without a permit, said on Thursday night that the controversial Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) would be passed on to the Council of Grand Justices to determine the constitutionality of several of its clauses.
The judge said in the meantime he did not have enough information to make a ruling in the case against National Taiwan University assistant professor Lee Ming-tsung (李明璁), a leader of the Wild Strawberries student movement in 2008.
On Nov. 6, 2008, the sociology professor led dozens of university students as they held a two-day sit-in at Liberty Square in Taipei to protest a police crackdown on the display of the Republic of China (ROC) national flag and the playing of Taiwanese songs during a visit by Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) earlier that week.
Along with a number of student leaders, Lee was forcibly evicted and arrested the next day after police said he did not hold a valid permit and accused him of refusing to disperse the crowd despite repeated warnings by officers. Prosecutors said Lee had not applied to hold the protest with Taipei police, in contravention of the act.
Restrictions placed on protesters by the Assembly and Parade Act are far-reaching and numerous.
Article 4 and Article 6 of the act state that protesters cannot speak in support of communist or pro-Taiwanese independence activities and that protests cannot take place near certain government buildings, airports, military installations and embassies.
The act also states that permits for protests must be applied for in writing with local police departments beforehand and that protests can be canceled or moved by the government because of adverse weather conditions or other “serious events” — without further elaboration.
On Thursday, Chen Ssu-fan said he was concerned that the articles in question could be in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, which protects freedom of assembly and association. He added that the restrictions could also violate the principles of two international conventions on human rights protection that were promulgated last year.
Leaving the courtroom following the judge’s decision, Lee told reporters the move was a “major step forward in Taiwan’s democratic development.”
He added he was even happier with the judge’s stance than he would have been if acquitted.
“The judge has taken this case up from an individual issue to a constitutional issue ... this will have long-term positive implications for the protection of human rights,” the 39-year-old professor said.
“I honestly think the judge has a lot of guts and his decision shows long-term vision,” Lee said.
Lin Feng-jeng (林峰正), an attorney and executive director at the Judicial Reform Foundation, which provided Lee with his legal team, also applauded the decision, saying he was optimistic the Grand Justices would find in favor of abolishing the act.
“Frankly, having the judge stop the case and actively ask for a constitutional interpretation was the most surprising thing that could have happened during this case,” he told the Taipei Times.
Civil organizations scrutinizing the case said they believe revisions to the act are long overdue and they agreed the decision would have long-term implications for Taiwan’s democracy.
“We have had concerns for a while now that the act is falling behind and can no longer protect the public’s constitutional rights and I think the judge’s decision reflects this,” Taiwan Association for Human Rights secretary-general Tsai Chi-hsun (蔡季勳) said.
The act, first passed in 1988 — a year after the end of martial law, has long been a cause of controversy for activists and politicians, who argue that it seeks to excessively regulate protesters and handicaps more spontaneous protests, compared with laws in the US and Europe.
The latest revisions, in 2002, relaxed some of the restrictions, but requests for an overhaul of the entire act have so far failed to reach a legislative consensus.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers yesterday said they would once again request that the Executive Yuan begin efforts to abolish the act, calling it an important indicator of whether the country was “truly democratic” — saying that such efforts should supersede party politics.
DPP Legislator Wong Chin-chu (翁金珠) commended Chen Ssu-fan for his handling of the case, which she said was an “historical issue” that would play an important part in Taiwan’s judicial reform.
AGING: As of last month, people aged 65 or older accounted for 20.06 percent of the total population and the number of couples who got married fell by 18,685 from 2024 Taiwan has surpassed South Korea as the country least willing to have children, with an annual crude birthrate of 4.62 per 1,000 people, Ministry of the Interior data showed yesterday. The nation was previously ranked the second-lowest country in terms of total fertility rate, or the average number of children a woman has in her lifetime. However, South Korea’s fertility rate began to recover from 2023, with total fertility rate rising from 0.72 and estimated to reach 0.82 to 0.85 by last year, and the crude birthrate projected at 6.7 per 1,000 people. Japan’s crude birthrate was projected to fall below six,
US President Donald Trump in an interview with the New York Times published on Thursday said that “it’s up to” Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) what China does on Taiwan, but that he would be “very unhappy” with a change in the “status quo.” “He [Xi] considers it to be a part of China, and that’s up to him what he’s going to be doing, but I’ve expressed to him that I would be very unhappy if he did that, and I don’t think he’ll do that. I hope he doesn’t do that,” Trump said. Trump made the comments in the context
SELF-DEFENSE: Tokyo has accelerated its spending goal and its defense minister said the nation needs to discuss whether it should develop nuclear-powered submarines China is ramping up objections to what it sees as Japan’s desire to acquire nuclear weapons, despite Tokyo’s longstanding renunciation of such arms, deepening another fissure in the two neighbors’ increasingly tense ties. In what appears to be a concerted effort, China’s foreign and defense ministries issued statements on Thursday condemning alleged remilitarism efforts by Tokyo. The remarks came as two of the country’s top think tanks jointly issued a 29-page report framing actions by “right-wing forces” in Japan as posing a “serious threat” to world peace. While that report did not define “right-wing forces,” the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs was
PREPAREDNESS: Given the difficulty of importing ammunition during wartime, the Ministry of National Defense said it would prioritize ‘coproduction’ partnerships A newly formed unit of the Marine Corps tasked with land-based security operations has recently replaced its aging, domestically produced rifles with more advanced, US-made M4A1 rifles, a source said yesterday. The unnamed source familiar with the matter said the First Security Battalion of the Marine Corps’ Air Defense and Base Guard Group has replaced its older T65K2 rifles, which have been in service since the late 1980s, with the newly received M4A1s. The source did not say exactly when the upgrade took place or how many M4A1s were issued to the battalion. The confirmation came after Chinese-language media reported
RSS