In a stunning turn of events in a 23-month-long court battle, a judge has decided to suspend the hearing and ask for a constitutional interpretation on whether illegal restrictions have been placed on the public’s right to assembly and on freedom of speech.
Taipei District Court Judge Chen Ssu-fan (陳思帆), presiding over a case where a university professor was arrested for holding a sit-in without a permit, said on Thursday night that the controversial Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) would be passed on to the Council of Grand Justices to determine the constitutionality of several of its clauses.
The judge said in the meantime he did not have enough information to make a ruling in the case against National Taiwan University assistant professor Lee Ming-tsung (李明璁), a leader of the Wild Strawberries student movement in 2008.
On Nov. 6, 2008, the sociology professor led dozens of university students as they held a two-day sit-in at Liberty Square in Taipei to protest a police crackdown on the display of the Republic of China (ROC) national flag and the playing of Taiwanese songs during a visit by Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) earlier that week.
Along with a number of student leaders, Lee was forcibly evicted and arrested the next day after police said he did not hold a valid permit and accused him of refusing to disperse the crowd despite repeated warnings by officers. Prosecutors said Lee had not applied to hold the protest with Taipei police, in contravention of the act.
Restrictions placed on protesters by the Assembly and Parade Act are far-reaching and numerous.
Article 4 and Article 6 of the act state that protesters cannot speak in support of communist or pro-Taiwanese independence activities and that protests cannot take place near certain government buildings, airports, military installations and embassies.
The act also states that permits for protests must be applied for in writing with local police departments beforehand and that protests can be canceled or moved by the government because of adverse weather conditions or other “serious events” — without further elaboration.
On Thursday, Chen Ssu-fan said he was concerned that the articles in question could be in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, which protects freedom of assembly and association. He added that the restrictions could also violate the principles of two international conventions on human rights protection that were promulgated last year.
Leaving the courtroom following the judge’s decision, Lee told reporters the move was a “major step forward in Taiwan’s democratic development.”
He added he was even happier with the judge’s stance than he would have been if acquitted.
“The judge has taken this case up from an individual issue to a constitutional issue ... this will have long-term positive implications for the protection of human rights,” the 39-year-old professor said.
“I honestly think the judge has a lot of guts and his decision shows long-term vision,” Lee said.
Lin Feng-jeng (林峰正), an attorney and executive director at the Judicial Reform Foundation, which provided Lee with his legal team, also applauded the decision, saying he was optimistic the Grand Justices would find in favor of abolishing the act.
“Frankly, having the judge stop the case and actively ask for a constitutional interpretation was the most surprising thing that could have happened during this case,” he told the Taipei Times.
Civil organizations scrutinizing the case said they believe revisions to the act are long overdue and they agreed the decision would have long-term implications for Taiwan’s democracy.
“We have had concerns for a while now that the act is falling behind and can no longer protect the public’s constitutional rights and I think the judge’s decision reflects this,” Taiwan Association for Human Rights secretary-general Tsai Chi-hsun (蔡季勳) said.
The act, first passed in 1988 — a year after the end of martial law, has long been a cause of controversy for activists and politicians, who argue that it seeks to excessively regulate protesters and handicaps more spontaneous protests, compared with laws in the US and Europe.
The latest revisions, in 2002, relaxed some of the restrictions, but requests for an overhaul of the entire act have so far failed to reach a legislative consensus.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers yesterday said they would once again request that the Executive Yuan begin efforts to abolish the act, calling it an important indicator of whether the country was “truly democratic” — saying that such efforts should supersede party politics.
DPP Legislator Wong Chin-chu (翁金珠) commended Chen Ssu-fan for his handling of the case, which she said was an “historical issue” that would play an important part in Taiwan’s judicial reform.
CARROT AND STICK: While unrelenting in its military threats, China attracted nearly 40,000 Taiwanese to over 400 business events last year Nearly 40,000 Taiwanese last year joined industry events in China, such as conferences and trade fairs, supported by the Chinese government, a study showed yesterday, as Beijing ramps up a charm offensive toward Taipei alongside military pressure. China has long taken a carrot-and-stick approach to Taiwan, threatening it with the prospect of military action while reaching out to those it believes are amenable to Beijing’s point of view. Taiwanese security officials are wary of what they see as Beijing’s influence campaigns to sway public opinion after Taipei and Beijing gradually resumed travel links halted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the scale of
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
Pope Francis is be laid to rest on Saturday after lying in state for three days in St Peter’s Basilica, where the faithful are expected to flock to pay their respects to history’s first Latin American pontiff. The cardinals met yesterday in the Vatican’s synod hall to chart the next steps before a conclave begins to choose Francis’ successor, as condolences poured in from around the world. According to current norms, the conclave must begin between May 5 and 10. The cardinals set the funeral for Saturday at 10am in St Peter’s Square, to be celebrated by the dean of the College
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s
RSS