The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) announced yesterday that it would submit a new referendum proposal tomorrow that aims to ask voters whether they agree with the government’s signing of a controversial trade pact with China.
Unhappy that the Central Election Commission (CEC) rejected a similar proposal earlier this month, the opposition party said it had gathered the necessary 86,000 petition forms to launch the first phase of a new referendum drive and did so faster than expected.
“The response we’ve received was overwhelming,” said TSU director Chou Ni-an (周倪安), one of the organizers of the drive. “On Saturday alone, we collected more than 20,000 petition forms, bringing our total to 110,000.”
The referendum push comes as cross-strait negotiators are expected to finish their talks and sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) in Chongqing, China, today.
Opposition parties, including the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the TSU, oppose the agreement over fears that an influx of less expensive Chinese goods could undermine Taiwanese jobs, hurt fragile industries and lock Taiwan into a “one China” market.
Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets in Taipei on Saturday, joining calls by the two opposition parties for a referendum on an ECFA. So far, two ECFA referendum proposals — one by the DPP and another by the TSU — have been rejected by the Referendum Review Committee.
The committee on June 3 said the referendum question and content contradicted one another, a decision that TSU Chairperson Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) has appealed.
This time, while the TSU does not plan to alter the text of the question, which asks voters whether they agree that the government should sign a ECFA with China, party officials said they would tweak the content to avoid having the committee deliver the same verdict.
“Our question ... and the content will be styled in a way that the public can freely say whether they agree or disagree with an ECFA,” Chou said.
The DPP said yesterday it would back the proposal.
“We respect the TSU proposal and the DPP will provide assistance if needed,” DPP spokesperson Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌) said.
Under the Referendum Act (公民投票法), the Central Election Commission has 15 days to either accept the proposal and pass it on to the committee or send it back to the organizers pending a correction of any errors found. The committee will then make a decision on whether to give the go-ahead within a month.
If passed, the TSU will have to gather 860,000 petition forms — 5 percent of the voting public in the last presidential election — before the proposal can be put to the ballot box.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY CNA
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday inaugurated the Danjiang Bridge across the Tamsui River in New Taipei City, saying that the structure would be an architectural icon and traffic artery for Taiwan. Feted as a major engineering achievement, the Danjiang Bridge is 920m long, 211m tall at the top of its pylon, and is the longest single-pylon asymmetric cable-stayed bridge in the world, the government’s Web site for the structure said. It was designed by late Iraqi-British architect Zaha Hadid. The structure, with a maximum deck of 70m, accommodates road and light rail traffic, and affords a 200m navigation channel for boats,
PRECISION STRIKES: The most significant reason to deploy HIMARS to outlying islands is to establish a ‘dead zone’ that the PLA would not dare enter, a source said A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) would be deployed to Penghu County and Dongyin Island (東引) in Lienchiang County (Matsu) to force the Chinese military to retreat at least 100km from the coastline, a military source said yesterday. Taiwan has been procuring HIMARS and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) from the US in batches. Once all batches have been delivered, Taiwan would possess 111 HIMARS units and 504 ATACMS, which have a range of 300km. Considering that “offense is the best defense,” the military plans to forward-deploy the systems to outlying islands such as Penghu and Dongyin so that
WHAT WAS ALL THAT FOR? Jaw Shaw-kong said that Cheng Li-wen had pushed for more drastic cuts and attacked him, just for the outcome to be nearly identical to his bill The legislature yesterday passed a supplementary budget bill to fund the purchase of separate packages of US military equipment, with the combined amount of spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.8 billion). The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) used their legislative majority to pass the bill, which runs until 2033 and has two main funding provisions. One was for NT$300 billion of arms sales already approved by the US for Taiwan on Dec. 17 last year, the other was for NT$480 billion for another arms package expected to be announced by Washington. The bill, which fell short of the NT$1.25
‘CLEAR MESSAGE’: The bill would set up an interagency ‘tiger team’ to review sanctions tools and other economic options to help deter any Chinese aggression toward Taiwan US Representative Young Kim has introduced a bill to deter Chinese aggression against Taiwan, calling for an interagency “tiger team” to preplan coordinated sanctions and economic measures in response to possible Chinese military or political action against Taiwan. “[Chinese President] Xi Jinping [習近平] has directed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. China has a plan. America should have one too,” Kim said in a news release on Thursday last week. She introduced the “Deter PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression against Taiwan act” to “ensure the US has a coordinated sanctions strategy ready should
RSS