The government executed four men at 7:30pm on Friday night, ending a moratorium on executions that had been in place since December 2005.
Premier Wu Den-yi (吳敦義) said yesterday that the government was simply upholding the rule of law and practicing social justice. The country must handle death row inmates according to the law unless there are legal reasons to justify suspending executions, he said.
The crimes for which the four were convicted met the current criteria for crimes meriting capital punishment: kidnapping and murder or multiple murders. However, whether all the legal requirements for carrying out the death penalty had been met and the timing of the executions are questionable.
Less than two months ago, former minister of justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) resigned over the furor that erupted when she refused to enforce the death penalty. Her successor, Minister of Justice Tseng Yung-fu (曾勇夫), told a public hearing on April 21 that the ministry would review the cases of all 44 inmates on death row and exhaust all measures before conducting executions. He also said the first executions would most likely take place before the end of the year.
Therefore, given both the moratorium and the Council of Grand Justices’ agreement to hear appeals of death-sentence cases, there was something unseemly about the rush to enforce the law. The council had given the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP), which filed a request for an interpretation on behalf of the 44 people on death row, until today to submit letters of authorization from the prisoners.
Government officials have consistently cited opinion poll findings that a majority of Taiwanese — 70 percent — favor keeping the death penalty. Yet other polls have found that 53 percent of respondents support replacing the death penalty with life imprisonment without parole. Sixty-two percent support commuting a death sentence to life or a long prison term if those convicted behave well in prison or show remorse, with 88 percent believe the death sentence could sometimes be handed down erroneously.
On April 8, Tseng told the legislature that even if most people said they supported the death penalty, the government would still push for abolition, though like other administration officials, he wouldn’t give a timetable.
News of the executions came on the same day as reports from Lebanon that a suspect in the murders of four family members had been lynched. A mob beat and stabbed the suspect to death, dragged his body through the streets so others could stomp on his corpse and then strung the body on a pole using a butcher’s hook. The Beirut government condemned the incident and vowed to punish those responsible, but some villagers quoted by wire agencies appear unrepentant about taking justice into their own hands.
The right to life should never be subject to opinion polls, just as a lynch mob should never replace the right to a fair trial. Protection of human rights means protecting people from shifting public opinion, shifts in political power and the arbitrary enforcement of justice.
While Friday night’s executions were not lynch mob justice, TAEDP executive director Lin Hsin-yi’s (林欣怡) characterization of them as hasty and furtive was absolutely spot-on.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS