Sun, May 02, 2010 page1

• Oil gush may grow 10-fold

  • AGENCIES, LOS ANGELES, MOUTH OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER and WASHIN
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The US Coast Guard now fears the underwater oil well spewing crude into the Gulf of Mexico could become an unchecked gusher shooting millions of liters of oil per day, the Mobile Press-Register reported yesterday, as the oil spill reached precious shoreline habitats and documents emerged showing British Petroleum (BP) downplayed the possibility of a catastrophic accident at the offshore rig that exploded.

  Citing a confidential National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration report on the unfolding spill disaster, the Alabama newspaper said two additional release points had been found in the tangled riser.

  “If the riser pipe deteriorates further, the flow could become unchecked resulting in a release volume an order of magnitude higher than previously thought,” the paper quotes the report as saying.

  

  Veterinarians help a Northern Gannet bird, normally white when full grown, at a ­facility in Fort Jackson, Louisiana, on Friday after it was coated in oil when visiting the Gulf Coast. 

  PHOTO: EPA

  In this case, it would mean the volume of oil coming from the well could be 10 times higher than the 5,000 barrels a day coming out now, the Press-Register concluded.

  That would mean 50,000 barrels, or 7.9 million liters, a day.

  The region threatened by the looming oil spill is a prime spawning ground for fish, shrimp and crabs, home to oyster beds and a major stop for migratory birds.

  “For birds, the timing could not be worse; they are breeding, nesting and especially vulnerable in many of the places where the oil could come ashore,” said Melanie Driscoll of the Audubon Society, a nature conservancy group.

  The first known wildlife casualty of the massive oil spill threatening the US Gulf Coast was a single Northern Gannet seabird, found alive, but coated in the toxic grime creeping ashore along Louisiana’s coast.

  That bird, recovered offshore on Friday and taken to an emergency rehabilitation center to be cleaned up and nursed back to health, is only the tip of a potential calamity facing the region’s birds, sea turtles and marine mammals.

  Besides the rescued Gannet, several sperm whales have been seen swimming in and around the oil slick.

  “We are expecting many more [casualties] in the days to come. We hope that number is not catastrophic. We’re ... hoping for the best but planning for the worst,” said Michael Ziccardi, a veterinarian overseeing some of the wildlife rescue teams in the region, in a telephone interview from Houma, Louisiana.

  Meanwhile, documents emerged showing that BP suggested last year in an exploration plan and environmental impact analysis for the well that an accident leading to a giant crude oil spill — and serious damage to beaches, fish and mammals — was unlikely, or virtually impossible.

  The Coast Guard estimates now that at least 6 million liters of oil have spilled since the April 20 explosion that killed 11 workers. The amount already threatens to make it the worst US oil disaster since the Exxon Valdez spilled 42 million liters of oil off Alaska’s shores in 1989.

  “The sort of occurrence that we’ve seen on the Deepwater Horizon is clearly unprecedented,” BP spokesman David Nicholas said on Friday. “It’s something that we have not experienced before ... a blowout at this depth.”

  The plan for the Deepwater Horizon well, filed with the federal Minerals Management Service, said repeatedly that it was “unlikely that an accidental surface or subsurface oil spill would occur from the proposed activities.”

  The company conceded a spill would impact beaches, wildlife refuges and wilderness areas, but argued that “due to the distance to shore [77km] and the response capabilities that would be implemented, no significant adverse impacts are expected.”

  Robert Wiygul, an Ocean Springs, Mississippi-based environmental lawyer and board member for the Gulf Restoration Network, said he doesn’t see anything in the document suggesting BP addressed the kind of technology needed to control a spill at that depth of water.

  “The point is, if you’re going to be drilling in 5,000 feet [1,500m] of water for oil, you should have the ability to control what you’re doing,” he said.

  The company has as yet failed to contain the spill.

  British energy giant BP said it is “taking full responsibility” for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and will pay for “legitimate claims” stemming from the disaster.

  “It was not our accident, but it is our responsibility to clean it up,” BP chief executive Tony Hayward told the Financial Times. “Where people have legitimate claims for damages, we will absolutely honor them.”

  The Pentagon meanwhile authorized the deployment of the Louisiana National Guard, some 6,000 troops, to respond to the crisis.

  US President Barack Obama said some 1,900 federal response personnel were in the area with 300 boats and aircraft and the southern states of Alabama and Mississippi yesterday declared a state of emergency because of the imminent threat of the oil slick.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Chinese technicians join airport MRT project

  • 2

    A train for whom? Is a new monorail helpful for Cairo?

  • 3

    Apple is giving Intel’s turnaround some momentum

  • 4

    Uncrewed US craft transits the Taiwan Strait

  • 5

    Starlux to expand long-haul flight offerings