Department of Health (DOH) Minister Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) made headlines on Monday by suddenly announcing his resignation, catching Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and the public off guard.
Yaung said he wanted to resign because he could not fulfil Wu’s request that 75 percent of those insured be exempted from a proposed increase in health insurance premiums. The Department of Health had proposed exempting only 59 percent of those insured. Saying the difference between the two could not be reconciled, Yaung insisted on leaving even though Wu rejected his resignation.
Yaung said when he took up the job seven months ago that premiums would have to be increased to resolve the National Health Insurance Program’s long-standing deficit. Yaung has kept his word, and his resignation has some lauding him for sticking to his guns and showing a sense of political responsibility.
However, while many are heaping praise on Yaung’s strength of character, many also vividly remember another promise he made when he assumed the post in August — to seek payment from the Taipei City Government on the debt it owes the national healthcare system.
“The Taipei City Government must pay its debt or the National Health Insurance’s finances will collapse sooner or later,” Yaung said at the time, adding that the city’s debt was the bureau’s biggest problem.
Taipei still owes the national healthcare system more than NT$34 billion (US$1.1 billion) and the Supreme Administrative Court has repeatedly ruled that it must pay up. The Kaohsiung City Government owes NT$16 billion, and has proposed paying the central government in installments. Meanwhile, the Taipei City Government has just been stalling.
Bureau of National Health Insurance Director Cheng Shou-hsia (鄭守夏) said the insurance program is running a NT$58.5 billion deficit, and its debt could exceed NT$101.5 billion by year-end. Yaung said the DOH’s proposed premium plan could help the bureau by bringing in an additional NT$4.5 billion per year.
Simple math suggests that the national healthcare system could quickly cut its debt nearly in half if Taipei followed Kaohsiung’s lead and paid its share of NT$34 billion. Indeed, the DOH could ask the Ministry of Justice to auction off plots of land that have been confiscated from the city government as security against the unpaid debt.
This begs the question: Why hasn’t Yaung kept his other promise and gone after the Taipei City Government? Could it be because the debt was accrued by former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is now the head of state?
Yaung has demonstrated strength of character by sticking to his word, even if it means putting his career on the line. However, his move may be perceived as little more than pretentious grandstanding when we take into account that he has been selective about which “guns” he sticks to and has avoided going after the big tiger.
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS