Department of Health (DOH) Minister Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) made headlines on Monday by suddenly announcing his resignation, catching Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and the public off guard.
Yaung said he wanted to resign because he could not fulfil Wu’s request that 75 percent of those insured be exempted from a proposed increase in health insurance premiums. The Department of Health had proposed exempting only 59 percent of those insured. Saying the difference between the two could not be reconciled, Yaung insisted on leaving even though Wu rejected his resignation.
Yaung said when he took up the job seven months ago that premiums would have to be increased to resolve the National Health Insurance Program’s long-standing deficit. Yaung has kept his word, and his resignation has some lauding him for sticking to his guns and showing a sense of political responsibility.
However, while many are heaping praise on Yaung’s strength of character, many also vividly remember another promise he made when he assumed the post in August — to seek payment from the Taipei City Government on the debt it owes the national healthcare system.
“The Taipei City Government must pay its debt or the National Health Insurance’s finances will collapse sooner or later,” Yaung said at the time, adding that the city’s debt was the bureau’s biggest problem.
Taipei still owes the national healthcare system more than NT$34 billion (US$1.1 billion) and the Supreme Administrative Court has repeatedly ruled that it must pay up. The Kaohsiung City Government owes NT$16 billion, and has proposed paying the central government in installments. Meanwhile, the Taipei City Government has just been stalling.
Bureau of National Health Insurance Director Cheng Shou-hsia (鄭守夏) said the insurance program is running a NT$58.5 billion deficit, and its debt could exceed NT$101.5 billion by year-end. Yaung said the DOH’s proposed premium plan could help the bureau by bringing in an additional NT$4.5 billion per year.
Simple math suggests that the national healthcare system could quickly cut its debt nearly in half if Taipei followed Kaohsiung’s lead and paid its share of NT$34 billion. Indeed, the DOH could ask the Ministry of Justice to auction off plots of land that have been confiscated from the city government as security against the unpaid debt.
This begs the question: Why hasn’t Yaung kept his other promise and gone after the Taipei City Government? Could it be because the debt was accrued by former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is now the head of state?
Yaung has demonstrated strength of character by sticking to his word, even if it means putting his career on the line. However, his move may be perceived as little more than pretentious grandstanding when we take into account that he has been selective about which “guns” he sticks to and has avoided going after the big tiger.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS