The Ministry of Finance yesterday said the breakdown of cross-strait negotiations on a tax pact on Monday was mainly the result of a dispute over levying income tax on China-based Taiwanese businesspeople according to where they reside or where they get paid.
The ministry said the breakdown was not related to sovereignty, apparently contradicting comments a day earlier by Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who said the deal was delayed because the treaty would have treated Taiwan the same as Hong Kong.
In a statement yesterday, the ministry said the two sides had engaged in several rounds of talks on the deal since October.
photo: AFP
“The two sides took a cautious approach and reached a basic consensus,” it said. “The mainland authorities later had other considerations on several technical issues. After further negotiations, the two sides failed to reach an agreement.”
Both sides have dismissed speculation that the failure was related to sovereignty.
But Wu told reporters at National Taiwan University Hospital’s International Convention Center on Tuesday that the reason the deal fell through was that Beijing asked Taiwan to follow similar deals it had with Hong Kong that levy income tax in the country where the income is earned.
Wu said China proposed the “source-based taxation” regime, backing away from the planned “residence-based” regime.
“Suddenly there were dissenting opinions on the Chinese side, suggesting [that Taiwan and China] sign the tax pact following the Hong Kong model — but the status of Taiwan is different from that of Hong Kong,” Wu said.
Wu said the government would hold out on the deal until the Chinese side agrees to residence-based taxation.
The agreement was intended to prevent double taxation in Taiwan and China of income earned by Taiwanese businesses based in China.
However, it had raised concerns from businesspeople, who feared that China would gain access to tax information to make unfounded tax evasion claims they say officials sometimes use to harass foreign businesses.
But Wu said any deal would not put China-based Taiwanese businesspeople at risk.
“There will not be a problem with tax inspections as long as they pay tax in accordance with regulations,” Wu said.
Chien Yao-tang (簡耀堂), a member of the pro-independence Taiwan Thinktank, said the tax deal would have caused more harm than good.
The deal would have increased the tax burden on businesspeople and limited their options to legally minimize their tax payments, Chien said.
Most China-based Taiwanese businesspeople do not have problems with tax investigations currently, Chien said.
The two sides signed three agreements on Tuesday covering the fishing industry, quality checks of agricultural products, and standardizing inspections and certification.
The Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection yesterday dismissed speculation that the last of these would pave the way for a “one-China market.”
Nor would the pact on inspection of agricultural products denigrate sovereignty or open the door to an influx of Chinese produce, the Council of Agriculture said in a statement yesterday.
The administration will not drop its ban on 830 agricultural products from China, while the agreement will expedite inspections of Taiwanese products and maintain inspection standards, it said.
The council also dismissed reports claiming that the agreement would lift the ban on hairy crabs from China, at the same time noting that imports of hairy crabs were allowed in 2001 when the previous administration was in power.
Future imports would need to meet national safety requirements for seafood, the council said.
The US government has signed defense cooperation agreements with Japan and the Philippines to boost the deterrence capabilities of countries in the first island chain, a report by the National Security Bureau (NSB) showed. The main countries on the first island chain include the two nations and Taiwan. The bureau is to present the report at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The US military has deployed Typhon missile systems to Japan’s Yamaguchi Prefecture and Zambales province in the Philippines during their joint military exercises. It has also installed NMESIS anti-ship systems in Japan’s Okinawa
‘WIN-WIN’: The Philippines, and central and eastern European countries are important potential drone cooperation partners, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung said Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) in an interview published yesterday confirmed that there are joint ventures between Taiwan and Poland in the drone industry. Lin made the remark in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper). The government-backed Taiwan Excellence Drone International Business Opportunities Alliance and the Polish Chamber of Unmanned Systems on Wednesday last week signed a memorandum of understanding in Poland to develop a “non-China” supply chain for drones and work together on key technologies. Asked if Taiwan prioritized Poland among central and eastern European countries in drone collaboration, Lin
BACK TO WORK? Prosecutors said they are considering filing an appeal, while the Hsinchu City Government said it has applied for Ann Kao’s reinstatement as mayor The High Court yesterday found suspended Hsinchu mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) not guilty of embezzling assistant fees, reducing her sentence to six months in prison commutable to a fine from seven years and four months. The verdict acquitted Kao of the corruption charge, but found her guilty of causing a public official to commit document forgery. The High Prosecutors’ Office said it is reviewing the ruling and considering whether to file an appeal. The Taipei District Court in July last year sentenced Kao to seven years and four months in prison, along with a four-year deprivation of civil rights, for contravening the Anti-Corruption
NO CONFIDENCE MOTION? The premier said that being toppled by the legislature for defending the Constitution would be a democratic badge of honor for him Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) yesterday announced that the Cabinet would not countersign the amendments to the local revenue-sharing law passed by the Legislative Yuan last month. Cho said the decision not to countersign the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) was made in accordance with the Constitution. “The decision aims to safeguard our Constitution,” he said. The Constitution stipulates the president shall, in accordance with law, promulgate laws and issue mandates with the countersignature of the head of the Executive Yuan, or with the countersignatures of both the head of the Executive Yuan and ministers or
RSS