The Ministry of Finance yesterday said the breakdown of cross-strait negotiations on a tax pact on Monday was mainly the result of a dispute over levying income tax on China-based Taiwanese businesspeople according to where they reside or where they get paid.
The ministry said the breakdown was not related to sovereignty, apparently contradicting comments a day earlier by Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who said the deal was delayed because the treaty would have treated Taiwan the same as Hong Kong.
In a statement yesterday, the ministry said the two sides had engaged in several rounds of talks on the deal since October.
photo: AFP
“The two sides took a cautious approach and reached a basic consensus,” it said. “The mainland authorities later had other considerations on several technical issues. After further negotiations, the two sides failed to reach an agreement.”
Both sides have dismissed speculation that the failure was related to sovereignty.
But Wu told reporters at National Taiwan University Hospital’s International Convention Center on Tuesday that the reason the deal fell through was that Beijing asked Taiwan to follow similar deals it had with Hong Kong that levy income tax in the country where the income is earned.
Wu said China proposed the “source-based taxation” regime, backing away from the planned “residence-based” regime.
“Suddenly there were dissenting opinions on the Chinese side, suggesting [that Taiwan and China] sign the tax pact following the Hong Kong model — but the status of Taiwan is different from that of Hong Kong,” Wu said.
Wu said the government would hold out on the deal until the Chinese side agrees to residence-based taxation.
The agreement was intended to prevent double taxation in Taiwan and China of income earned by Taiwanese businesses based in China.
However, it had raised concerns from businesspeople, who feared that China would gain access to tax information to make unfounded tax evasion claims they say officials sometimes use to harass foreign businesses.
But Wu said any deal would not put China-based Taiwanese businesspeople at risk.
“There will not be a problem with tax inspections as long as they pay tax in accordance with regulations,” Wu said.
Chien Yao-tang (簡耀堂), a member of the pro-independence Taiwan Thinktank, said the tax deal would have caused more harm than good.
The deal would have increased the tax burden on businesspeople and limited their options to legally minimize their tax payments, Chien said.
Most China-based Taiwanese businesspeople do not have problems with tax investigations currently, Chien said.
The two sides signed three agreements on Tuesday covering the fishing industry, quality checks of agricultural products, and standardizing inspections and certification.
The Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection yesterday dismissed speculation that the last of these would pave the way for a “one-China market.”
Nor would the pact on inspection of agricultural products denigrate sovereignty or open the door to an influx of Chinese produce, the Council of Agriculture said in a statement yesterday.
The administration will not drop its ban on 830 agricultural products from China, while the agreement will expedite inspections of Taiwanese products and maintain inspection standards, it said.
The council also dismissed reports claiming that the agreement would lift the ban on hairy crabs from China, at the same time noting that imports of hairy crabs were allowed in 2001 when the previous administration was in power.
Future imports would need to meet national safety requirements for seafood, the council said.
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday that China using armed force against Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, allowing the country to mobilize the Japanese armed forces under its security laws. Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session yesterday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan’s Asahi Shimbun. "If warships are used and other armed actions are involved, I believe this could constitute a survival- threatening
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS