The ruckus surrounding Premier Wu Den-yih’s (吳敦義) Hong Kong trip continued to escalate yesterday as the Democratic Progressive Party accused President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Wu of lying about the reasons for Wu’s trip, urging them to tell the truth.
“Wu’s Sept. 5 trip to Hong Kong pertains not only to his allegiance to the country, but also to the honesty of the leader of our country,” DPP spokesman Chao Tien-lin (趙天麟) told a news conference. “We therefore hope that Wu and President Ma will clearly explain everything to the public.”
On Sept. 3 and Sept. 4, Ma talked with Wu about appointing him premier. Wu left for Hong Kong on Sept. 5 and returned the following afternoon before the Presidential Office announced Wu would take office on Sept. 7.
The DPP has accused Wu of discussing his premiership with Leung Chun-ying (梁振英) during his stay in Hong Kong.
Hong Kong media has speculated that Leung — the convener of the territory’s Executive Council and a permanent member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) — is Beijing’s favored candidate to become Hong Kong’s next chief executive. The DPP has accused Wu of making the visit to gain approval for his premiership from China.
The Executive Yuan on Tuesday confirmed that Wu met Leung and had lunch with him at noon on Sept. 5. However, discrepancies remain between accounts of the trip offered by Ma, Wu, Wu’s aide, and Executive Yuan Spokesman Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) regarding the purpose of the trip and Wu’s activities, the DPP said.
Ma told Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers at a dinner on Friday that Wu visited Hong Kong’s Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD), as per his suggestion.
However, Wu said Ma did not suggest he visit the CEDD, nor did he go there because “it was the weekend.”
“Apparently, Ma and Wu collaborated to make up something to deceive the public,” Chao said at the press conference. “So now it’s not only Wu who has to clarify it to the people, Ma has to explain himself as well.”
While Su on Tuesday made public letters between Wu and Leung to prove that Wu went to Hong Kong at Leung’s invitation, Chao also cast doubt on those.
In the letter from Leung to Wu, Leung said he would respectfully await the visit of Wu and his family and brief him about protection of mountains.
“It doesn’t seem like an invitation to me — it’s more like a reply to Wu’s request to visit Hong Kong,” Chao said.
While Wu called Leung an expert in mudslide prevention, Chao said Leung has only written articles about “one country, two systems” and the economic cooperation framework agreement.
“Clearly he isn’t an expert in mudslide prevention,” Chao said.
Another difference in accounts was that Su said Wu visited Hong Kong at the invitation of Leung, but Wu said it was his initiative to visit Leung.
“It’s true that I took initiative to contact [Leung], but it’s not correct to use the term that I ‘begged’ to see him. It’s not a relationship between superiors and subordinates. We are friends,” Wu said.
Wu said that Leung visited him on Aug. 14 after he was invited by the Lung Yintai Cultural Foundation to deliver a speech in Taiwan and shared Hong Kong’s experiences in mudslide prevention with him.
“It was then that we made the appointment for me to visit him. [Leung] said then that he would wait for me in Hong Kong and have related materials [on mudslide warning and prevention] ready,” Wu said.
Facing pressure to make public his Hong Kong itinerary, Wu yesterday described himself as “a free man” prior to taking up premiership because he was a KMT legislator as well as the party’s vice chairman and secretary-general.
“As a free man, I don’t need to tell everything down to the details. Do I have to let everyone know what time I went back to my hotel and entered the room? Do I need to tell people who don’t believe me which department store I went to and which tie I bought?” Wu said.
“People who suspect that I met the Chinese Communist Party [CCP] and held secret talks: Please specify when I met the CCP,” Wu said.
Wu said he was more than willing to open himself to criticism in terms of his capacity, his understanding of the government’s policies, morality and integrity, but the allegations should not be “so ridiculous.”
“I went to Hong Kong to learn about a successful example of mudslide prevention in my capacity as a lawmaker of the Republic of China,” Wu said.
“Did I break any rules or regulations?” he asked.
When asked for comment, KMT Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) said the DPP had exaggerated the nature of Wu’s trip.
“It is true that Premier Wu failed to clearly account for his trip in the first place, but the DPP has over-manipulated the matter,” Lo said. “Leung is only a possible candidate for Hong Kong governor. He is not yet a real candidate.”
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY FLORA WANG
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday said it is closely monitoring developments in Venezuela, and would continue to cooperate with democratic allies and work together for regional and global security, stability, and prosperity. The remarks came after the US on Saturday launched a series of airstrikes in Venezuela and kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who was later flown to New York along with his wife. The pair face US charges related to drug trafficking and alleged cooperation with gangs designated as terrorist organizations. Maduro has denied the allegations. The ministry said that it is closely monitoring the political and economic situation
Conflict with Taiwan could leave China with “massive economic disruption, catastrophic military losses, significant social unrest, and devastating sanctions,” a US think tank said in a report released on Monday. The German Marshall Fund released a report titled If China Attacks Taiwan: The Consequences for China of “Minor Conflict” and “Major War” Scenarios. The report details the “massive” economic, military, social and international costs to China in the event of a minor conflict or major war with Taiwan, estimating that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could sustain losses of more than half of its active-duty ground forces, including 100,000 troops. Understanding Chinese
UNRELENTING: China attempted cyberattacks on Taiwan’s critical infrastructure 2.63 million times per day last year, up from 1.23 million in 2023, the NSB said China’s cyberarmy has long engaged in cyberattacks against Taiwan’s critical infrastructure, employing diverse and evolving tactics, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said yesterday, adding that cyberattacks on critical energy infrastructure last year increased 10-fold compared with the previous year. The NSB yesterday released a report titled Analysis on China’s Cyber Threats to Taiwan’s Critical Infrastructure in 2025, outlining the number of cyberattacks, major tactics and hacker groups. Taiwan’s national intelligence community identified a large number of cybersecurity incidents last year, the bureau said in a statement. China’s cyberarmy last year launched an average of 2.63 million intrusion attempts per day targeting Taiwan’s critical
‘SLICING METHOD’: In the event of a blockade, the China Coast Guard would intercept Taiwanese ships while its navy would seek to deter foreign intervention China’s military drills around Taiwan this week signaled potential strategies to cut the nation off from energy supplies and foreign military assistance, a US think tank report said. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducted what it called “Justice Mission 2025” exercises from Monday to Tuesday in five maritime zones and airspace around Taiwan, calling them a warning to “Taiwanese independence” forces. In a report released on Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of War said the exercises effectively simulated blocking shipping routes to major port cities, including Kaohsiung, Keelung and Hualien. Taiwan would be highly vulnerable under such a blockade, because it
RSS