The Taiwan Sports Lottery is issued based on the Public Welfare Lottery Issue Act (公益彩券發行條例).
The selection of retailers, prize payout ratio and the use of net revenues must be in accordance with the act, and this has caused operational problems that must be resolved.
A look at foreign sports lotteries shows that retailers selling lottery tickets are mostly related to the sports field and have a thorough understanding of sports.
This has an effect on the promotion of lottery ticket sales.
Looking back at Taiwan, the operator of the sports lottery must obey Article 8 of the lottery act by selecting “handicapped people who are capable of working, Aborigines and single-parent, low-income families” as retailers.
Because of these restrictions, the expertise of retailers is not very closely related to sports.
The result is that there is still much room for improving ticket sales.
Article 5 of the lottery act states: “The prize payout ratio of the lottery shall not exceed 75 percent of the total amount of lottery issued unless otherwise approved by the authorities in charge.”
The 75 percent ceiling restricts the setting of odds and causes operators to avoid such restrictions indirectly by launching “combination bets” in order to increase prize money.
Foreign sports betting Web sites or local illegal underground bookies pay out almost 90 percent. This means that they offer better odds than the sports lottery.
GAMBLERS
Obviously, such high ratios are much more attractive to gamblers. If one of the government’s purposes of issuing the sports lottery is to combat illegal underground gambling, it may be difficult to achieve that goal when the prize payout ratio is restricted like this.
Finally, the biggest problem created by the act concerns the use of profits.
Article 6 of the lottery act states: “All lottery revenues shall be used by the government only for the national pension system, the national health insurance program’s safety reserve and other social welfare expenses other than social welfare expenses that have been allocated and granted according to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法).”
Thus all the revenue from the sports lottery goes to social welfare and nothing is fed to the sports sector.
Even though the operator paid the government almost NT$700 million (US$20.5 million) last year and will pay over NT$1 billion this year, neither baseball nor other sports will benefit from the money.
CONTRADICTION
This clearly contradicts the original purpose of the sports lottery, as it fails to interact constructively with the nation’s sports industry, and that is a shame.
At a time when we are discussing the defeat of the Taiwanese team at the World Baseball Classic tournament in Tokyo, I call on President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration to propose an exclusive sports lottery act and for the legislature to pass it.
Hopefully, the sports lottery would be able to attract social resources for sports development and maybe even allocate funds specifically for baseball.
By doing so, perhaps Taiwan’s team can make a breakthrough and reach the top again.
Chen Yue-hsin is vice chairman of the Chinese Taipei Baseball Association.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS