The Executive Yuan's Referendum Review Committee, which in June turned down the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) proposal for a referendum on the nation's application to join the UN, yesterday gave the go-ahead to a similar proposal by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The committee's approval means that there will now be two referendums on securing a UN seat, should both parties complete the second stage of their signature collection drives, in which they need more than 825,359 signatures supporting the referendum.
The DPP started its second-stage signature drive earlier this month after the Cabinet's Appeal Committee last month overruled the review committee's rejection.
The DPP referendum would ask whether the nation should apply for UN membership under the name of "Taiwan," while the KMT version would ask whether the nation should use the name "Republic of China (ROC)" to apply to the UN and seek entry into other international organizations under a "practical" title that would uphold the nation's dignity.
The two parties hope to hold the referendums along with the presidential election in March.
The Referendum Law (公民投票法) stipulates that the second-stage signature drive has to be completed within six months of the Central Election Commission verifying the first-stage signatures.
"As the two proposals were both approved, it's unlikely they will be merged into one," Review Committee Chairman Kao Yuang-kuang (高永光) said, responding to a suggestion by Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮).
Lu recently expressed concern that neither proposal would succeed because of the high threshold for approving a referendum if they were held simultaneously.
Kao said at a press conference after the meeting that the 14-seat committee had approved the KMT proposal by a vote of eight to four.
The eight "yes" votes were from members representing the KMT, while Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) representative Chien Lin Whei-jun (錢林慧君), Non-Partisan Solidarity Union representative Yang Tai-shun (楊泰順) and the two People First Party representatives, Hu Tsu-ching (胡祖慶) and Ma Chieh-ming (馬傑明), all voted "no."
The review committee, composed of members recommended by political parties in proportion to their legislative seats, originally had 21 seats, but the eight DPP representatives resigned en masse following the rejection of the DPP's proposal.
"I voted against the DPP proposal because it involved changing the nation's title, which involves amending the Constitution rather than being a topic for a referendum. I also worried about the consequences for US-Taiwan relations. I voted against the KMT proposal for the same reason," Hu said at the press conference.
Chien Lin said she was against the KMT's proposal because the format was not suitable for a referendum.
"It was a question of choice, not a question of `yes' or `no.' It is designed to ask voters whether they support the name `ROC,' `Taiwan' or other names. But a referendum should pose a `yes-or-no' question," Chien Lin said.
DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-chin (葉宜津) criticized the KMT's referendum proposal, saying that applying for UN membership using the name "ROC" would only cause international confusion.
"The DPP's [draft] `normal country' resolution states clearly that we need to gain entry to the UN using the name `Taiwan' because the name `ROC' may be mistaken for the `People's Republic of China [PRC],'" she said.
DPP caucus whip Wang Sing-nan (
He said he supported whatever name the government used to obtain UN membership, "so long as the ROC is no longer considered part of the PRC."
TSU caucus whip Tseng Tsahn-deng (曾燦燈) said the KMT's referendum proposal was not feasible, because UN Resolution 2758 clearly stated that "the ROC has been replaced by the PRC."
Meanwhile, the People First Party issued a statement yesterday outlining its opposition to the KMT's referendum bid.
"The move will hurt the Republic of China before the nation can benefit from it. It won't help to stabilize cross-strait relations and will have a negative impact on US-Taiwan relations," it said.
Additional reporting by Flora Wang and Mo Yan-chih
Taiwan is projected to lose a working-age population of about 6.67 million people in two waves of retirement in the coming years, as the nation confronts accelerating demographic decline and a shortage of younger workers to take their place, the Ministry of the Interior said. Taiwan experienced its largest baby boom between 1958 and 1966, when the population grew by 3.78 million, followed by a second surge of 2.89 million between 1976 and 1982, ministry data showed. In 2023, the first of those baby boom generations — those born in the late 1950s and early 1960s — began to enter retirement, triggering
ECONOMIC BOOST: Should the more than 23 million people eligible for the NT$10,000 handouts spend them the same way as in 2023, GDP could rise 0.5 percent, an official said Universal cash handouts of NT$10,000 (US$330) are to be disbursed late next month at the earliest — including to permanent residents and foreign residents married to Taiwanese — pending legislative approval, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. The Executive Yuan yesterday approved the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及民生國安韌性特別條例). The NT$550 billion special budget includes NT$236 billion for the cash handouts, plus an additional NT$20 billion set aside as reserve funds, expected to be used to support industries. Handouts might begin one month after the bill is promulgated and would be completed within
NO CHANGE: The TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the status of Taiwan to have been determined by WWII-era documents, a former AIT deputy director said The American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) comments that World War-II era documents do not determine Taiwan’s political status accurately conveyed the US’ stance, the US Department of State said. An AIT spokesperson on Saturday said that a Chinese official mischaracterized World War II-era documents as stating that Taiwan was ceded to the China. The remarks from the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan drew criticism from the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation, whose director said the comments put Taiwan in danger. The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday reported that a US State Department spokesperson confirmed the AIT’s position. They added that the US would continue to
IMPORTANT BACKER: China seeks to expel US influence from the Indo-Pacific region and supplant Washington as the global leader, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said China is preparing for war to seize Taiwan, Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said in Washington on Friday, warning that Taiwan’s fall would trigger a regional “domino effect” endangering US security. In a speech titled “Maintaining the Peaceful and Stable Status Quo Across the Taiwan Strait is in Line with the Shared Interests of Taiwan and the United States,” Chiu said Taiwan’s strategic importance is “closely tied” to US interests. Geopolitically, Taiwan sits in a “core position” in the first island chain — an arc stretching from Japan, through Taiwan and the Philippines, to Borneo, which is shared by
RSS