The arms-procurement bill again failed to pass the legislature's Procedure Committee yesterday, all but dashing government hopes for it to be reviewed by the legislature before legislative elections next month.
There is one more committee session to be held next Tuesday, but even if the bill is passed at that meeting, there will not be another sitting of the current legislative session to allow the statute to be delivered to relevant committees for review.
PHOTO: GEORGE TSORNG, TAIPEI TIMES
The bill's failure to pass the committee resulted from objections by the pan-blue camp, with some opposition legislators expressing hostility toward the bill before the meeting started.
Yesterday's highly anticipated meeting saw the presence of committee members who otherwise rarely attend.
Though there were neither lunch box fights nor scuffles yesterday, the committee members verbally abused each other and quarreled throughout the meeting.
The meeting was chaired by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯), who opened the session with an instruction that lunch boxes be taken from the room. Tsai also condemned Hsieh Ta-ning (謝大寧), who resigned as convener of the Democracy Advancement Alliance yesterday, for accusing unnamed lawmakers of being bribed by the Ministry of National Defense to support the bill. The ministry has commenced legal action against Hsieh.
Speaking on the bill, pan-green camp committee members said it was necessary to fortify the nation's defenses, while pan-blue camp members suggested the bill would be best put aside until after the election so that the public could have a say in the issue.
"If the pan-blue camp really considers the cost to be too high, at least we should allow the bill to pass the committee and let the lawmakers conduct a professional debate on the issue in the relevant committees," DPP Legislator Lee Wen-chung (
One pan-blue camp lawmaker said the election should determine the fate of the bill.
"Lawmakers who support or object to the deal will be able to see what the people really want after the election. It is better to discuss the deal after the election," People First Party (PFP) Legislator Lee Yung-ping (李永萍) said.
But when the time came to vote on the bill, Tsai announced an adjournment, and pan-green lawmakers left the meeting in protest.
As the lawmakers withdrew, the two camps hurled insults at each other. Pan-green lawmakers called the pan-blue legislators members of a "China Party," while the pan-blue lawmakers scolded the pan-green lawmakers for being members of a "War Party."
Tsai himself disappeared for a while, leading to speculation that he had abandoned the session. But later he returned, with only two DPP lawmakers in tow. The pan-green camp lost the resulting vote.
While the two camps argued on the bill inside the legislature, anti-arms-bill activists, organized by the Democracy Advancement Alliance, protested outside. Pro-arms-bill legislative candidates and their supporters, some manning a truck modified to look like a tank, also made their presence felt.
The two sides scuffled sporadically, but no injuries were reported.
Premier Yu Shyi-kun expressed disappointment at the bill's failure to pass the committee.
"The deal was first planned and settled on when KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS