Both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps agreed to recount all the ballots from the presidential election, but neither political alliance wants to be responsible for paying the necessary expenses to conduct the process.
The Taiwan High Court held the first hearing for the suit yesterday. The suit was filed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-People First Party (PFP) alliance in order to suspend President Chen Shui-bian (
How to process the recount and who will pay the necessary expenses of the legal process were the subject of arguments between the plaintiff and the defendant.
PHOTO: CNA
Prior to yesterday's hearing, the parties had not come to an agreement on how to recount the ballots.
In addition to recounting invalid ballots, the KMT-PFP alliance insisted on examining and recounting only the valid ballots cast in favor of Chen and Lu. But the pan-green camp said that all ballots, including valid and invalid, should be examined and recounted at the same time.
Presiding Judge Wu Ching-yuan (吳景源) asked both parties to come up with an agreement and submit it to the court within five days.
However, during the hearing, one of the pan-blues' lawyers said that the plaintiff would "respect the DPP's decision regarding the process of recounting the ballots." The statement was interpreted as an acknowledgement that the pan-blues' previous position -- recounting only the votes in favor of Chen -- was unlikely to find a sympathetic hearing in the court
In addition, after the hearing had concluded, Tsai Yu-ling (蔡玉玲), one of the KMT-PFP alliance's lawyers, again said that "it will not be difficult to come up with an agreement with the pan-green camp over this issue."
During the hearing, Wu said "do not come back to the court and ask us to pay your legal fees once the case is closed."
Both parties had different views regarding how to pay off the legal bill.
Lee Yi-kwang (
"The case concerns the Presidential Election and Recall Law [總統副總統選舉罷免法]. The law also regulates that the process of a suit should follow the Code of Civil Procedure [民事訴訟法]," Lee said.
"However, the case itself is an administrative error, so the plaintiff is not supposed to pay, as the mistake was made by a third party, which is a government office," the lawyer said.
The "government office" Lee was referring to is the Central Election Committee (CEC). According to Lee's arguments, when the Presidential Election and Recall Law was passed, the Code of Administrative Procedure (
In response to the KMT-PFP alliance's argument, Wellington Koo (顧立雄), one of the Democratic Pro-gressive Party's (DPP) law-yers, said that the defendant was not required to pay either, because they are merely cooperating with the plaintiff's and the public's request.
"If we ask for a recount, we should expect to have to pay," said Koo. "But we did not ask for a recount."
In the meantime, Wu said that the court will negotiate with the CEC and determine whether it is possible to process the recount for free.
If so, the court will only have to witness and oversee the process of the recount.
"To `witness' and `oversee' such a process is our job, so there will not be any extra fees. Then, all of the financial problems will be solved," Wu said.
In addition to the arguments over the issues of how the recount shall be processed and who will pay the legal fees, DPP lawyers have also rebutted the arguments of the KMT-PFP alliance's lawyers as to why the pan-blues filed such a suit.
According to one of the pan-blues' lawyers, Hanson Chiang (
"In addition to the alleged vote-rigging, the launch of the so-called `national security mechanism' and the cancelation of all campaign activities affected many voters' -- mostly soldiers' and police officers' -- legal rights to participate in the election, since they had to stay on duty to conduct strict security measures. That hurt us a lot," Chiang said.
However, Koo said that these arguments should not be regarded as valid by the court because the pan-blue camp has not provided any evidence to support their allegations.
"All of the complaints they have made are about how the CEC performed its work," Koo said. "These other arguments are not relevant, are they?"
In addition to both parties' lawyers, yesterday's hearing was also attended by nearly 100 reporters and 50 observers. Wu did not announce a date for the second hearing of the case.
Taiwan’s exports soared to an all-time high of US$61.8 billion last month, surging 49.7 percent from a year earlier, as the global frenzy for artificial intelligence (AI) applications and new consumer electronics powered shipments of high-tech goods, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. It was the first time exports had exceeded the US$60 billion mark, fueled by the global boom in AI development that has significantly boosted Taiwanese companies across the international supply chain, Department of Statistics Director-General Beatrice Tsai (蔡美娜) told a media briefing. “There is a consensus among major AI players that the upcycle is still in its early stage,”
The Central Weather Administration (CWA) yesterday said it expected to issue a sea warning for Typhoon Fung-Wong tomorrow, which it said would possibly make landfall near central Taiwan. As of 2am yesterday, Fung-Wong was about 1,760km southeast of Oluanpi (鵝鑾鼻), Taiwan’s southernmost point, moving west-northwest at 26kph. It is forecast to reach Luzon in the northern Philippines by tomorrow, the CWA said. After entering the South China Sea, Typhoon Fung-Wong is likely to turn northward toward Taiwan, CWA forecaster Chang Chun-yao (張峻堯) said, adding that it would likely make landfall near central Taiwan. The CWA expects to issue a land
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday that China using armed force against Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, allowing the country to mobilize the Japanese armed forces under its security laws. Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session yesterday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan’s Asahi Shimbun. "If warships are used and other armed actions are involved, I believe this could constitute a survival- threatening
RSS