Yesterday's weekly Cabinet meeting became a verbal battlefield for Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Kaohsiung Mayor Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) over the planned referendum.
Claiming to speak on behalf of the public and local government chiefs, Ma questioned the legality and necessity of the referendum proposed by President Chen Shui-bian (
He also proposed that the referendum be separated from the presidential election at the polls.
Hsieh, however, questioned Ma's representation of the people and other elected local leaders and said Ma misconstrued the Referendum Law (
Hsieh branded Ma's criticism of the planned referendum an insult.
Seeking to relieve the tension among his colleagues, Premier Yu Shyi-kun called on government employees and agencies to fulfill their duties and help the Cabinet hold the first national referendum.
Cabinet Spokesman Lin Chia-lung (
As the Referendum Law clearly mandates that the president has the right to initiate a referendum to safeguard the sovereignty and security of the nation if he deems the nation is in danger, Yu said, it is without a doubt legal for Chen to hold the referendum.
According to Lin, the war of words between Ma and Hsieh and other Cabinet officials started when Ma called on Yu to send Chen's referendum proposal to the Referendum Review Committee, which would then examine its legality, necessity, urgency and appropriateness.
Ma argued that the referendum is not necessary because the nation is not in a state of emergency.
"The nation has been under military threat from China for half a century but has never been in a state of emergency. If Chen can call a `peace referendum' to safeguard national security, do future presidents have to do so every year?" he asked.
Ma also proposed separating the presidential election and the referendum because they are two different kinds of polls bound by two separate pieces of legislation and yielding two different results.
Cabinet officials, including Hsieh, Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) and Mainland Affairs Council Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), however, said it is legal for Chen Shui-bian to call the referendum and that the proposal does not require the consent of the Referendum Review Committee.
Chen Ding-nan said it was wrong for Ma to mention the peace referendum and state of emergency in the same breath because the referendum is meant to pre-empt a possible emergency situation, while a state of emergency is declared to deal with an emergency situation.
He said it is inappropriate for the Referendum Review Committee, a subordinate unit of the Cabinet, to review the referendum proposal, adding that the Referendum Law does not require the committee to do so.
Hsieh, meanwhile, criticized Ma's likening of the referendum to an act of theft and his branding of civil servants cooperating to hold the referendum as Chen's accomplices.
"It's clearly an insult and stigmatization of the head of state and civil servants," he said.
DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Taiwan shares the same values as those that fought in WWII, and nations must unite to halt the expansion of a new authoritarian bloc, Lai said The government yesterday held a commemoration ceremony for Victory in Europe (V-E) Day, joining the rest of the world for the first time to mark the anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe. Taiwan honoring V-E Day signifies “our growing connections with the international community,” President William Lai (賴清德) said at a reception in Taipei on the 80th anniversary of V-E Day. One of the major lessons of World War II is that “authoritarianism and aggression lead only to slaughter, tragedy and greater inequality,” Lai said. Even more importantly, the war also taught people that “those who cherish peace cannot
STEADFAST FRIEND: The bills encourage increased Taiwan-US engagement and address China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758 to isolate Taiwan internationally The Presidential Office yesterday thanked the US House of Representatives for unanimously passing two Taiwan-related bills highlighting its solid support for Taiwan’s democracy and global participation, and for deepening bilateral relations. One of the bills, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, requires the US Department of State to periodically review its guidelines for engagement with Taiwan, and report to the US Congress on the guidelines and plans to lift self-imposed limitations on US-Taiwan engagement. The other bill is the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan or its people in
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo on Friday expressed concern over the rate at which China is diversifying its military exercises, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Saturday. “The rates of change on the depth and breadth of their exercises is the one non-linear effect that I’ve seen in the last year that wakes me up at night or keeps me up at night,” Paparo was quoted by FT as saying while attending the annual Sedona Forum at the McCain Institute in Arizona. Paparo also expressed concern over the speed with which China was expanding its military. While the US
‘FALLACY’: Xi’s assertions that Taiwan was given to the PRC after WWII confused right and wrong, and were contrary to the facts, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday called Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) claim that China historically has sovereignty over Taiwan “deceptive” and “contrary to the facts.” In an article published on Wednesday in the Russian state-run Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Xi said that this year not only marks 80 years since the end of World War II and the founding of the UN, but also “Taiwan’s restoration to China.” “A series of instruments with legal effect under international law, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration have affirmed China’s sovereignty over Taiwan,” Xi wrote. “The historical and legal fact” of these documents, as well
RSS