The government should ban shark-finning to not only conserve sharks but also avoid creating a negative image of the country to the rest of the world, local and foreign conservationists said yesterday.
At a press conference yesterday in Taipei, a six-minute videotape about what shark-finning entails was shown to the public. In the documentary, the remainder of an injured shark, whose fins had been removed on board, was discarded at sea.
PHOTO: SEAN CHAO, TAIPEI TIMES
Conservationists from Life Conservation Association and WildAid, an international conservation group, said these ghastly images are just part of the extreme brutality sharks are subjected to.
The videotape has been played in the UK, the US and Singapore. It will be played in more countries where WildAid campaigns against shark-finning.
According to conservationists, while the Taiwanese public tries to play its part in shark conservation, Taiwan remains the largest fin-trader in the world.
"Before the government takes any action, consumers should refuse shark-fin soup," Buddhist Master Shih Chao-hui (釋昭慧) of Life Conservation Association said.
Shih said that people should consider the inhumanity behind the consumption of shark-fin soup.
Every year millions of sharks are killed to meet the ever growing demand for shark-fin soup.
Conservationists from WildAid said Taiwanese shark-fishing companies take advantage of the poverty of developing countries, which often cannot afford to enforce their own laws against shark-finning.
In a recently completed report entitled "Shark Finning: Unrecorded Wastage on a Global Scale," Taiwanese ships are blamed for depleting the resources of other countries in their race to meet demand for shark fins.
The report highlighted two recent cases in Costa Rica. One case was exposed in July, when a video was shot showing about 30 bags of shark fins found at a private dock where Taiwanese fishing vessels often land their hauls of shark fins.
It later transpired that the official cargo declaration from the Taiwanese vessel, Ho Tsai Fa No. 18, was for 60,000kg of shark fins.
The other case involved the seizure of 30 tonnes of fins belonging to the Goidau Roey No.1, which was flying a Panamanian flag, on May 31.
"We urge the Council of Agriculture to enact legislation to prevent Taiwanese fishing companies overseas from finning sharks, even if this means putting a governmental observer on every vessel," said Susie Watts, a WildAid consultant who wrote the report.
Wu Hsinn-charng (
"The available evidence accusing Ho Tsai Fa No. 18 is relatively weak because the fin and the remainder are often managed separately," Wu said.
Wu said the second case was irrelevant to Taiwan because the vessel was registered overseas.
Wu said Costa Rica did not officially ban shark finning until last month.
There are more than 380 species of sharks. Wu said Taiwanese fishermen catch certain species, such as silky sharks and blue sharks, to ensure resources are sustainable.
Endangered species, which grow slowly and have late sexual maturity, have been protected by Taiwan since July last year, when a limit of 80 was set on the number of whale sharks that could be caught every year.
According to the council, 800,000 tonnes of sharks are fished annually in the world. Taiwan ranks fifth in shark fishing, with its 7 percent share worth more than NT$1 billion.
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is