Despite the Presidential Office's plan to prohibit human cloning, the Cabinet has not included a controversial clause in the draft bill of the human-rights act (人權法) it is considering.
"As the rest of the world is still polarized about this contentious issue, we don't think it's a good idea to include it in the legislation," said Peter Huang (黃文雄), a member of the Cabinet's human-rights committee and an advisor to the president.
"Besides, human dignity and academic liberty have to be taken into account," he said.
A Cabinet official who asked not to be named told the Taipei Times that the Cabinet may enact a separate law to regulate human cloning instead of including it in the human-rights law.
The Presidential Office on Saturday unveiled its draft-human-rights act, which would allow same sex marriages, abolish the death penalty and prohibit experiments into the cloning of human beings as well as cloning itself.
To avoid controversy, the Cabinet's draft, which is an integrated version of the proposals drafted by the Presidential Office's human-rights advisory group and the Ministry of Justice, fails to touch on the issue of human cloning but agrees that the death penalty should be abolished in a piecemeal fashion.
Until the ultimate goal is achieved, the Cabinet's draft states that executions for those under the age of 18 and pregnant women should be prohibited. In addition, capital punishment could only be used on those committing the most hideous, violent crimes to be in line with the penal law.
The Cabinet draft also expands the rights of homosexuals, allowing them to form families and adopt children.
The draft also touches on another contentious issue -- referendums. It stipulates that everyone should have the right to vote on public policy, legislation and constitutional issues through referendums.
To prevent and minimize the negative impact of inappropriate human-rights measures or legislation, the Cabinet's draft states that the government should establish a human-rights-impact-assessment system and make public human-rights report on a regular basis.
In order to better protect and promote human rights, a national human-rights commission should be established, according to the Cabinet's draft.
As the Cabinet is soliciting opinions from local and international human-rights groups as well as government agencies on the Cabinet's draft, Huang said that he does not expect the draft to be completed by the end of the year.
"While there's no timetable set, we hope to wrap things up by next spring if everything goes as smoothly as we expect," he said, adding that democratic consultation and public debate during the course of legislation are paramount.
Huang also revealed that the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) has expressed keen interest in providing training programs to lawyers, judges, law enforcement officers and civil servants with an interest in applying human rights related cases and in bringing complaints to the UN Human Rights Committee.
The ICJ is a Geneva-based non-governmental organization dedicated to the coherence and implementation of international law and principles that advance human rights.
The organization's commissioner and its coordinator of the National Implementation Program visited in August to help the government incorporate the international Bill of Rights, the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights into domestic law through the human-rights act.
Four more ICJ experts are scheduled to attend a six-day closed-door seminar between Nov. 17 and Nov. 23 to offer their opinions on the Cabinet's draft.
The US Department of State yesterday criticized Beijing over its misrepresentation of the US’ “one China” policy in the latest diplomatic salvo between the two countries over a bid by Taiwan to regain its observer status at the World Health Assembly, the decisionmaking body of the WHO. “The PRC [People’s Republic of China] continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy,” Department of State spokesman Ned Price wrote on Twitter. “The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, Three Joint Communiques, and
FATES LINKED: The US president said that sanctions on Russia over Ukraine must exact a ‘long-term price,’ because otherwise ‘what signal does that send to China?’ US President Joe Biden yesterday vowed that US forces would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of a Chinese attack in his strongest statement to date on the issue. Beijing is already “flirting with danger,” Biden said following talks with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo, in which the pair agreed to monitor Chinese naval activity and joint Chinese-Russian exercises. Asked if Washington was willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied: “Yes.” “That’s the commitment we made,” Biden said. “We agreed with the ‘one China’ policy, we signed on to it ... but the idea that it can be
INFORMATION LEAKED: Documents from Xinjiang purportedly showed top leaders in Beijing calling for a forceful crackdown and even orders to shoot to kill Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) yesterday held a videoconference with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet as she visited Xinjiang during a mission overshadowed by fresh allegations of Uighur abuses and fears she is being used as a public relations tool. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been accused of detaining more than 1 million Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in the region as part of a years-long crackdown the US and lawmakers in other Western nations have labeled a “genocide.” China denies the allegations. Bachelet was expected to visit the cities of Urumqi and Kashgar on a six-day tour. The US
SUBTLE? While Biden said the US policy of ‘strategic ambiguity’ on Taiwan had not changed, the group targeted China and Russia without naming them Leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US yesterday warned against attempts to “change the status quo by force,” as concerns grow about whether China could invade Taiwan. The issue of Taiwan loomed over a leadership meeting in Tokyo of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) nations — the US, Japan, Australia and India — who stressed their determination to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific region in the face of an increasingly assertive China, although Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said the group was not targeting any one country. The four leaders said in a joint statement issued after their talks