The Chinese Communist Party's 16th National Congress is underway in Beijing with important decisions on China's leadership being made over the course of the next five days. However, looking at the content of the report Chinese President Jiang Zemin (
Chinese officials recently launched a rhetorical offensive to push for direct links, sparking expectations that Jiang's report to the congress would break new ground -- that Beijing would show some flexibility. Such expectations have been dashed. Jiang said nothing new about Taiwan. Since he will continue to call the shots for the foreseeable future his report will dictate Beijing's policies toward Taiwan for the next two or three years.
Jiang's policies toward Taiwan have been a failure because he has never been able to understand public opinion in this country. His eight-point policy on Taiwan remains just a piece of paper.
Taiwan is very different from Hong Kong or Macau. The ROC is an independent sovereignty established in 1912. It did not disappear after the PRC's establishment, but instead has continued to enjoy sovereignty over its own territory and population. Therefore any discussions between Taipei and Beijing must be at the level of two independent states, not between a central government and a "renegade province." China wants cross-strait relations to be conducted under the premise of its "one China" principle. It wants Taiwan to give up its self-esteem and status and accept the "one country, two systems" scheme. If the leadership in Beijing was younger, one might be tempted to ask what it had been smoking.
Even talk between a man and a woman about marriage has to be an act of free will. One side can extend a proposition and try to make the other side happy. However, if your potential partner threatens to blow your brains out with a gun if you don't marry them, it is not exactly what one would consider a friendly offer. But this is what China's Taiwan policy is like.
The unification of two countries is a marriage of thousands of families. State leaders need to consider the optimum welfare of all of them. Despite his emphasis on peaceful unification, Jiang has also vowed not to renounce the use of force, warning Taiwan that it cannot delay unification indefinitely. No parent can ever accept such a belligerent marriage proposition, much less a state leader.
A normal relationship between a man and a woman should begin from friendship and then proceed toward marriage, not the other way around. Beijing's Taiwan policy is to force Taipei to recognize "one China" before any negotiation can begin -- which is equivalent to forcing a marriage before the two sides have become friends. This is diametrically opposite to the normal procedure, where people interact on an equal basis before they discuss marriage.
Cross-strait relations reached an impasse more than 10 years ago because Chinese leaders of Jiang's generation were unable to overcome their blind spots. Hopefully the next generation of leaders will see that equality and mutual benefit should be the true nature of cross-strait relations. Hopefully they will remove the unnecessary ballistic missiles deployed against Taiwan and try to win acceptance from the people of Taiwan through a normal relationship.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS