A group of lawmakers from across party lines yesterday appealed for the quick handling of a bill designed to enable the establishment of an anti-corruption agency. The bill has been stalled in the legislature for weeks by objections raised by the majority KMT caucus.
The lawmakers argued that an agency specializing in cracking down on corruption is badly needed by Taiwan, which has won a bad name internationally for its corruption problem.
"Even the US has listed corruption as a major barrier to trade with Taiwan. The corruption problem has continued from the time of the old government to the new one without any indication that it is dying out," said New Party Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆).
Other legislators joining the cause yesterday included independent Eugene Jao (趙永清), the KMT's Chen Shei-saint (陳學聖) and the People First Party's Liu Wen-hsiung (劉文雄).
They cited the examples of Hong Kong's Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) and Singapore's Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), which have helped reduce political corruption and increase the competitiveness of those countries.
The Ministry of Justice has submitted to the legislature a bill to establish an anti-corruption agency, but the bill has not been able to move on to a legislative committee for review and debate.
According to Jao, KMT legislators have blocked the bill in the Procedure Committee six times in a row.
"It is time for the KMT, which lost power because of its `black gold' problem, to show its sincerity and resolution to attack this problem and stop barring the establishment of the anti-corruption agency," Jao said.
In response, KMT caucus whip Cheng Yung-chin (鄭永金) explained that his party had not objected to establishing the anti-corruption agency, but thinks that the proposed bill deserves further consideration. "If we aren't careful, we may create a redundant `administrative monster.' It will be too late to rectify by then," Cheng said.
Cheng said it would be more appropriate to discuss the matter in an inter-party negotiation before letting the bill proceed to a legislative committee, and that the KMT would soon submit its own proposal for an anti-corruption agency under the Control Yuan.
Under the ministry's proposal, the anti-corruption agency would be directly under the ministry.
Currently, the ministry has a Government Ethics Department, while most other government agencies have a department serving a similar purpose.
The KMT has argued that the key issue is to boost the efficiency of these departments, and that it would be a waste of public resources to set up the anti-corruption agency while these departments already exist. Under its proposal, the "ethics departments" would be abolished.
Chen, a pro-reform KMT legislator, however, said these details should be discussed while the bill is debated in a legislative committee, rather than brought up even before the bill has had a chance to go forward.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS