Opposition lawmakers yesterday put forth a compromise measure that may end the ongoing workweek dispute.
At issue is whether Taiwan's workers will put in 44 hours of work per week beginning Jan. 1 or 84 hours per fortnight.
Lawmakers have proposed keeping the 84-hour-per-fortnight measure, but still want to allow employers the ability to negotiate with their employees to schedule longer hours.
PHOTO: CHEN CHENG-CHANG, TAIPEI TIMES
"In principle, we still stick to the 84-hour-per-fortnight measure," said Lai Shyh-bao (
Under the proposal -- which has been jointly endorsed by leaders of the KMT, People First Party and New Party caucuses -- the maximum number of hours an employee is required to work cannot exceed 84 in a two-week period.
However, the limit could be set at 88 hours over a two-week period if employers obtain union approval or if at least half of a company's workers agree. In addition, local officials in charge of labor affairs must formally approve the plan.
PHOTO: CHEN CHENG-CHANG, TAIPEI TIMES
PFP caucus spokeswoman Diane Lee (李慶安) said involving labor affairs officials would help facilitate mediation in case of a dispute.
The opposition legislators said the proposal is pending the consent of labor representatives before the measure can be passed in the next Legislative Yuan meeting on Tuesday.
While industry representatives have accepted the proposal, labor groups have yet to weigh in on the idea.
"The two sides will take the proposal back to conduct further internal discussions. We are doing our best to seek a solution that satisfies both of them," said KMT caucus whip Her Jyh-huei (
Opposition lawmakers put forth yesterday's proposal after labor groups refused to sit down to negotiate with the DPP legislative caucus, which was pushing the Executive Yuan's plan to introduce a 44-hour workweek on Jan. 1.
Worker representatives have insisted that the legislature stick to its June 16 decision to go for an 84-hour-per-fortnight measure.
Lin Huei-kwung (
Meanwhile, some workers expressed fear that if employers were offered the ability to negotiate with employees, workers who want shorter hours but lack popular support would be forced to accept a longer workweek.
"It's impossible for workers who are not organized to fight with their employers. This is like making workers accept a 44-hour workweek automatically," said Wuo Young-Ie (
But a different group of workers from the textile industry offered a different opinion at the Legislative Yuan yesterday.
These workers said because their employers have earned less money due to the slowing economy, further shortening the workweek would simply worsen the situation.
"If our factories are closed down, we will lose our jobs," one of the textile workers said.
In addition, Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tseh (
Lee said because employee paychecks won't decline after the workweek is shortened to 84 hours per fortnight from 48 hours per week today -- a 4.5 percent reduction -- Taiwan firms would need to increase productivity by 20 percent.
If a company fails to boost productivity, bankruptcy will result and workers will become jobless, Lee warned.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s