Three DPP legislators called yesterday for an investigation into the unlawful trip to China of a retired intelligence official, saying he might threaten Taiwan's national security.
Pan Hsi-hsien (潘希賢), the just-retired Director of Personnel and General Affairs at the National Security Bureau, visited China on June 4, only seventy-two hours after retiring. Though it is unknown whether he is still in China, information from Taiwan businessmen in China confirms that the former senior official has been seen in Guangdong.
According to Taiwan regulations, any individual who has held an official post involving national security -- including defense, intelligence, and security agencies -- is required to get government approval before traveling to China up to three years after retirement.
Pan, whose China trip was disclosed only last Wednesday by a KMT legislator, left Taiwan before the NSB had informed immigration authorities of his retirement. As a result, the immigration authorities were unable to prevent the trip.
DPP legislators Chang Ching-fang (張清芳), Wang Hsing-nan (王幸男), and Wang Li-ping (王麗萍), visited the Control Yuan yesterday, requesting the official watchdog carry out an investigation into Pan's breach of security regulations.
The legislators said they were worried that Pan, with his extensive knowledge of the nation's secret files, might leak information about Taiwan's intelligence operations.
"He knows exactly who's who among the country's intelligence agents, and where, both in Taiwan and China, they're deployed. If by any chance he leaks such information to China, the consequences will be disastrous," Wang said, underlining the seriousness of Pan's unlawful actions to Control Yuan member Frank Liao (廖健男).
Regulations concerning visits to China by Taiwan nationals were amended as recently as March this year to lay down rules applying to those whose work involves national security.
The responsible authority, the Ministry of the Interior, should have informed other government agencies of the changes following the passing of the amendments. NSB officials, however, said they have still not received notification from the ministry.
The legislators said former Minister of the Interior Huang Chu-wen (黃主文) was to blame for this, and requested that the Control Yuan investigate his "negligence."
They said that it was a matter of concern that Pan had apparently entered China with ease as the Chinese authorities often seek to prevent the entry of retired Taiwan government officials, suspecting that they might be on intelligence-gathering missions.
"Given his senior position in the NSB, we are even more concerned about why he is there," said Chang.
Chang also said that sources had told him that Pan had been upset about being forced to retire by his supervisor, who had discovered his involvement in an extra-marital affair.
"We're worried that he might attempt to harm the country as a consequence," Chang said.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS